Evaluating Effectiveness of Gurupi Biological Reserve of the medium-to large-sized Terrestrial Vertebrates Conservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v11i3.1769Keywords:
Amazon region of Maranhão Brazilian State , TEAM protocol, biodiversity monitoringAbstract
The TEAM camera trap protocol to monitor medim- to large-sized terrestrial vertebrates, allow estimates of biodiversity parameters that inform protected area managers about threats to biodiversity or the impact of management actions. In this study, we present results of four years of camera trap monitoring at Gurupi Biological Reserve to evaluate its effectiveness in conserving medium- to large-sized terrestrial vertebrates from the Amazon region of Maranhão Brazilian State. We evaluate trends in species richness, community composition, species occupancy rates, and Wildlife Picture Index to assess biodiversity status and trends. We recorded 36 species of medium- to large-sized vertebrates, representing 72% of the birds and 96% of the mammals of Amazon region of Maranhão. The monitored populations, including endemic and endangered species, remained stable over 4 years monitoring. Occupancy rates for most species increased as well as the Wildlife Picture Index. Possibly these trends are related to wildlife recovery after a wildfire that hit Gurupi Biological Reserve in 2015, and indicates the resilience of the protected area after a severe impact. The results show the Gurupi Biological Reserve has been effective in its goal of conserving medium-to large-sized terrestrial vertebrates.Â
References
Ahumada JÁ et al. 2011. Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1578), 2703-2711. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0115.
Ahumada JA, Hurtado J & Lizcano D. 2013. Monitoring the Status and Trends of Tropical Forest Terrestrial Vertebrate Communities from Camera Trap Data: A Tool for Conservation. PLoS ONE 8: e73707. Library of Science.
Ahumada JA, O'Brien TG, Mugerwa B & Hurtado J. 2016. Camera trapping as a monitoring tool at national and global levels. Pages 197-218 in F. Rovero and F. Zimmerman, editors. Camera Trapping for wildlife Research. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, UK.
Alteff EF et al. 2019. The rarest of the rare: rediscovery and status of the critically endangered Belem Curassow, Crax fasciolata pinima (Pelzeln, 1870). Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia, 59, e20195946. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.46.
Almeida AS & Vieira ICG. 2010. Centro de Endemismo Belém: status da vegetação remanescente e desafios para a conservação da biodiversidade e restauração ecológica. Revista de Estudos Universitários. Sorocaba, SP, v. 36, n. 3, p. 95-111.
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL & Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6): 711- 728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
Astete S et al. 2007. Comparative ecology of jaguars in Brazil. CAT News 9-14. Beaudrot L et al. 2016. Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight. PLoS Biology 14: e1002357. Library of Science.
Beaudrot L, Ahumada JA, O'Brien TG, Jansen PA. 2018. Detecting tropical wildlife declines through camera-trap monitoring: an evaluation of the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring protocol. Oryx: 1-4.
Beschta RL & Ripple WJ. 2009. Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biological Conservation, 142(11): 2401-2414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.015.
Braga PIS. 1979. Subdivisão fitogeográfica, tipos de vegetação, conservação e inventário florístico da floresta Amazônica. Supl. Acta Amazonica, 9: 53-80.
Brasil. 1988. Decreto no 95.614, de 11 de janeiro de 1988. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/1980-1989/D95614.htm. Acesso em: 20/06/2020.
Braz LC, Pereira JLG, Ferreira LV & Thalês MC. 2017. A situação das áreas de endemismo da amazônia com relação ao desmatamento e à s áreas protegidas. Boletim de Geografia, v. 34, n. 3, p. 45-62.
Burnham KP & Overton WS. 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65: 625-633.
Burnham KP & Overton WS. 1979. Robust estimation of population-size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60: 927-936.
Buss G et al. 2017. Abundância e densidade de primatas na Reserva Biológica do Gurupi, Maranhão. Brasil. Biodiversidade Bras. 47-57.
Carvalho Jr. EAR. 2012. Relatório Anual de Atividades de Pesquisa e Monitoramento do Centro Nacional dePredadores/CENAP/ICMBio. Não do.
Carvalho Jr. EAR. 2017. Relatório de Avaliação populacional da onça-pintada na REBIO do Gurupi & Avaliação do impacto de incêndios florestais sobre a fauna da REBIO do Gurupi. CENAP/ICMBio. Não do.
Carvalho Jr. EAR, Mendonça EN, Martins A & Haugaasen T. 2020. Effects of illegal logging on Amazonian medium and large-sized terrestrial vertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management, 466: 118105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118105.
Ceballos G & Ehrlich PR. 2006. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103(51): 19374 LP - 19379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609334103.
Celentano D et al, 2017. Towards zero deforestation and forest restoration in the Amazon region of Maranhão state, Brazil. Land Use Policy 68: 692-698. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.041.
Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 31: 343-366TEAM Network. 2011. Terrestrial vertebrate (camera trap) monitoring protocol implementation manual. Page Terrestrial Vertebrate Protocol Implementation Manual.
Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM & Jetz W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: Species evel foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals. Ecology, 95: 2027-2027. doi:10.1890/13-1917.1.
Vieira OQ & Oliveira TG. 2020. Non-volant mammalian species richness in the ecotonal Brazilian midnorth: checklist for Maranhão State. Biota Neotropica 20(2): e20190912. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0912.
Yu-Sung S. 2020. R2jags: A Package for Running jags from R. Package version 0: 6-1. CRAN. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/R2jags/R2jags.pdf. Acesso em: 20/06/2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.
