Diagnóstico de pesquisas realizadas em unidades de conservação: subsídio ao programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade de manguezais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v6i1.503Keywords:
biodiversity, conservation, mangrove, monitoring, protected areasAbstract
This article presents a diagnosis, as part of the planning process of the project entitled "Mangrove
Biodiversity Monitoring Program of Federal Protected Areas - MoMa", supported by ICMBio. The aim was
to identify and evaluate researches on the biodiversity of the mangroves that have the potential to contribute
to monitoring of these ecosystems within protected areas (UCs). The methodology involved searches on the
"Cadastro Nacional de Unidades de Conservação - CNUC" and on the "Sistema de Autorização e Informação em Biodiversidade - SISBIO", as well as a survey through interviews with representatives of UCs, which wasdone by using structured questionnaires. A total of 50 UCs with mangroves were recorded; 32% of which were
strict protection UCs while 68% were sustainable use ones. From a total of 48 UCs that had their questionnaires
filled, the majority (56%) still lack data on mangrove coverage. According to managers, 48% of the UCs have
never carried out any scientific research on mangrove biodiversity. In addition, 162 registered researches with
potential for use in monitoring programs were poorly distributed geographically, with a higher concentration in
the states of Para and Paraíba. This could hinder the formation of a national network of monitoring programs. The
researches had a greater focus on particular species, especially those ones that are threatened by overexploitation
(eg. mangrove crab, Ucides cordatus) or facing extinction risk (eg. manatee, Trichechus manatus). This fact can
promote the formation of a network of monitoring actions that are expected to benefit these species. On the other
hand, there is a concern about the lack of studies on important species for conservation such as congregatory
birds (eg. scarlet ibis, Eudocymus ruber). Because 60% of existing research is performed by universities, they
are indicated to be important potential partners for the UCs that undertake monitoring actions. However, we
observed that a trend for these researches is that they have a short-term duration (average of two years), probably
due to limited time frame of the studies (mostly PhD and Master thesis) and/or limited financial resources, which
prevent long-lasting monitoring programs. So, it seems that a major challenge for developing and implementing
the biodiversity monitoring program for mangroves is not only the establishment of feasible and standardized
methods, but also the continuity of follow-up studies conducted by sequential researchers within UCs. For this
purpose, the fundraising process by linking monitoring programs with the environmental licensing of companies
for resource exploitation as well as the investment on participatory monitoring programs are two promising
strategies that can promote the Monitoring Program implementation.
References
Abreu, M.C.S.; Mattos, P.; Lima, P.E.S. & Padula, A.D. 2011. Shrimp farming in coastal Brazil: Reasons for market failure and sustainability challenges. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54: 658-667.
Diele, K.; Koch, V. & Saint-Paul, U. 2005. Population structure, catch composition and CPUE of the artisanally harvested mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Ocypodidae) in the Caeté estuary, North Brazil: Indication for overfishing? Aquatic Living Resources, 18: 169-178.
Field, S.A.; O'Connor, P.J.; Tyre, A.J. & Possingham, H.P. 1991. Making monitoring meaningful. Austral Ecology, 32: 485-491.
Glaser, M. & Diele, K. 2004. Asymmetric Outcomes: Assessing Central Aspects of the Biological, Economic and Social Sustainability of Mangrove Crab Fishery, Ucides cordatus (OCYPODIDAE), in North Brazil. Ecological Economics, 49: 361-373.
Holland, G.J.; Alexander, J.S.A.; Johnson, P.; Arnold, A.H.; Halley, Merril, H. & Bennett, A.F. 2012. Conservation cornerstones: Capitalising on the endeavours of long-term monitoring projects. Biological Conservation, 145: 95-101.
ICMBIO (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade). Portal do Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Disponível em: . (Acesso em 03/2012).
Lamb, E.G.; Bayne, E.; Holloway, G.; Schieck, J.; Boutin, S.; Herbers, J. & Haughland, D.L. 2009. Indices for monitoring biodiversity change: Are some more effective than others? Ecological Indicators, 9: 432-444.
Lindenmayer, D.B. & Likens, G.E. Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. 2009. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24: 482-486. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Gibbons, P.; Bourke, M.; Burgman, M.; Dickman, C.R.; Ferrier, S.; Fitzsimons, J.; Freudenberger, D.; Garnett, S.T.; Groves, C.; Hobbs, R.J.; Kingsford, R.T.; Krebs, C.; Legge, S.; Lowe, A.J.; Mclean, R.; Montambault, J.; Possingham, H.; Radford, J.; Robinson, D.; Smallbone, L.; Thomas, D.; Varcoe, T.; Vardon, M.; Wardle, G.; Woinarski, J. & Zerger, A. 2012. Improving biodiversity monitoring. Austral Ecology, 37: 285-294.
Lovett, G.M.; Burns, D.A.; Driscoll, C.T.; Jenkins, J.C.; Mitchell, M.J.; Rustad, L.; Shanley, J.B.; Likens, G.E. & Haeuber, R. 2007. Who needs environmental monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5: 253-260.
MMA (Gerência de Biodiversidade Aquática e Recursos Pesqueiros). 2010. Panorama da Conservação dos Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos no Brasil. Relatório Técnico. MMA/SBF/GBA, 148p.
Oliveira, L.A.K.; Freitas, R.R. & Barroso, G.F. 2005. Manguezais: Turismo e Sustentabilidade. Caderno Virtual de Turismo, 5(3): 51-56.
Prates, A.P.L. Unidades de Conservação Costeiras e Marinhas. Disponível em: (Acesso em 06/2012).
Schaeffer-Novelli, Y.; Rovai, A.S.; Coelho-Jr, C.; Menghini, R.P. & Almeida, R. 2012. Alguns impactos do PL 30/2011 sobre os Manguezais brasileiros, p. 18-27. In. Comitê Brasil em Defesa das Florestas e do Desenvolvimento Sustentável (Ed.). Código Florestal e a Ciência: o que Nossos Legisladores Ainda Precisam Saber. Comitê Brasil em Defesa das Florestas e do Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 115p.
Schmidt, A.J.; Theil, C.M.I. & Galli, O.B.S. 2008. Estudos preliminares sobre efeitos de uma mortalidade em massa em uma população de caranguejo-uçá, Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), em Caravelas (Bahia -Brasil). Boletim Técnico Científico do CEPENE, v. 16, p. 51-57.
Schmidt, A.J.; Bemvenuti, C.E. & Diele, K. 2012. Effects of geophysical cycles on the rhythm of mass mate searching of a harvested mangrove crab. Animal Behaviour, v. 84, p. 333-340.
Schmidt, A.J.; Bemvenuti, C.E. & Diele, K. 2013. Sobre a definição da zona de apicum e a sua importância ecológica para populações de caranguejo-uçá, Ucides cordatus. Boletim Técnico Científico do CEPENE, 19(1): 9-25.
Spellerberg, I.F. 2005. Monitoring Ecological Change. Cambridge University Press, 410p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais de seus artigos sem restrições, concedendo ao editor direitos de ção não exclusivos.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.