Mamíferos no voladores de la Reserva Biológica Jaru, Rondônia, Amazonas, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v15i2.2523Palabras clave:
Mastofauna , transecto lineal , cámara trampa, programa de monitoreo , biodiversidad , selva amazónicaResumen
La Amazonía es reconocida como el bosque tropical más grande del mundo, siendo la zona silvestre con mayor biodiversidad. Sin embargo, en varias regiones de este bioma, existen lagunas en el conocimiento sobre la distribución geográfica de las especies, conocidas como la brecha de Wallace. Aquí describimos datos sobre la presencia de mamíferos registrados en la Reserva Biológica Amazónica Jaru, Rondônia, Brasil. Nuestros datos se basan en una combinación de dos metodologías durante un período de seis años, de 2016 a 2022, con un total de 490 km de censos de transectos lineales y 270 días de trampas cámaras. El estudio revela la importante importancia de la reserva, que alberga 43 taxones de mamíferos no voladores, que representan más del 20% de las especies registradas para el estado de Rondônia. Destacamos la presencia de especies en peligro de extinción y enfatizamos la relevancia de la Reserva Biológica Jaru como un enclave crucial para la conservación de la biodiversidad. Además, discutimos la complementariedad de diferentes metodologías de muestreo y abordamos desafíos y estrategias para la protección continua de la biodiversidad ante la creciente presión antropogénica en esta región de la Amazonía, que está causando reducciones significativas en la diversidad.
Descargas
Citas
1. Daru BH, le Roux PC, Gopalraj J, Park DS, Holt BG, Greve, M. Spatial overlaps between the global protected areas network and terrestrial hotspots of evolutionary diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2019; 28(6): 757-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12888
2. Baccini AGSJ, Goetz SJ, Walker WS, Laporte NT, Sun M, Sulla-Menashe D. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon density maps. Nature Climage Change. 2012; 2(3): 182–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1354
3. Instituto de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. IBGE lança mapa inédito de Biomas e Sistema Costeiro-Marinho 2019 [cited 2023 Sep 8]. Available in: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/pt/agencia-press-room/2185-news-agency/releases-pt/25812-ibge-lanca-mapa-inedito-de-biomas-e-sistema -costeiro-marinho-2 » https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/en/agencia-press-room/2185-news-agency/releases-en/25812-ibge-lanca-mapa-inedito-de-biomas-e-sistema-costeiro-marinho-2
4. Montibeller B, Kmoch A, Virro H, Mander Ü, Uuemaa E. et al. Increasing fragmentation of forest cover in Brazil’s Legal Amazon from 2001 to 2017. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1): 5803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62591-x
5. Bogoni JA, Peres CA, Ferraz KM. Extent, intensity, and drivers of mammal defaunation: a continental-scale analysis across the Neotropics. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1): 14750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72010-w
6. Silveira MV, Silva‐Junior CH, Anderson LO, Aragão LE. Amazon fires in the 21st century: The year of 2020 in evidence. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2022; 31(10): 2026-2040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13577
7. Gray CL, Hill SLL, Newbold T, Hudson LN, Börger L, Contu S, Hoskins AJ, Ferrier S, Purvis A, Scharlemann JPW. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications. 2016; 7(1): 12306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306
8. Godet L, Devictor V. What conservation does. Trends in ecology & evolution. 2018; 33(10):720-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.07.004
9. Pedlowski M, Dale V, Matricardi, E. A criação de áreas protegidas e os limites da conservação ambiental em Rondônia. Ambiente & sociedade. 1999; 5:93-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X1999000200008
10. Lindsey PA, Petracca LS, Funston PJ, Bauer H, Dickman A, Everatt K et al. The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey. Biological Conservation. 2017; 209: 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.01.011
11. Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Joppa LN. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110(28): E2602–E2610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302251110
12. Magioli M, Ferraz KMPMB, Chiarello AG, Galetti M, Setz EZF, Paglia AP, Abrego N, Ribeiro MC, Ovaskainen O. Land-use changes lead to functional loss of terrestrial mammals in a Neotropical rainforest. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 2021; 19(2): 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.02.006
13. Sobral M, Silvius KM, Overman H, Oliveira LFB, Raab TK, Fragoso JMV. Mammal diversity influences the carbon cycle through trophic interactions in the Amazon. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017; 1(11): 1670–1676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0334-0
14. Villar N, Paz C, Zipparro V, Nazareth S, Bulascoschi L, Bakker ES, Galetti M. Frugivory underpins the nitrogen cycle. Functional Ecology. 2021; 35(2): 357–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13707
15. Andriolo A, de Almeida Silveira MÁP, Costa Doria CR. Biodiversidade Faunística de Rondônia: O perfil da produção científica. Revista de Administração e Negócios da Amazônia. 2021; 13(3): 198–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18361/2176-8366/rara.v13n3p198-212
16. Goebel LGA, Bogoni JA, Longo GR, Palmeirim AF, Fermiano EC, Silva DJ, Ignácio, ARA, Santos-Filho M. 2025. Multi-faceted decline of vertebrate diversity in an endemism zone of the Brazilian Amazon. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2025; 126842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126842
17. Bogoni JA, Peres CA, Ferraz KM. Medium‐to large‐bodied mammal surveys across the Neotropics are heavily biased against the most faunally intact assemblages. Mammal Review. 2022; 52(2): 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12274
18. Antunes AC, Montanarin A, Gräbin DM, Monteiro ECS, Pinho FF, Alvarenga GC et al. AMAZONIA CAMTRAP: A data set of mammal, bird, and reptile species recorded with camera traps in the Amazon forest. Ecology. 2022; 103(9): e3738.
19. Ferronato ML, Bonavigo PH, Messias MR, Silva NMO. Manejo florestal Sustentável e a mastofauna amazônica: O caso da fazenda Manoa, Rondônia, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Amazônia. 2018; 7(2): 9–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47209/2317-5729.v.7.n.2.p.9-18
20. Medeiro AZ, Araújo LS, Oliveira MA. Riqueza de mamíferos de médio e grande porte em Área de Preservação Permanente do distrito de Jaci Paraná, Rondônia. Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Amazônia. 2019; 8(2): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47209/2317-5729.v.8.n.2.p.1-8
21. da Silva Gondim TM, Borges LHM, Oliveira MA. Medium and large-sized mammals in a remnant forest in the state of Rondônia, Brazil. Mammalogy Notes. 2021; 7(2): 259–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47603/mano.v7n2.259
22. Silva-Diogo O, Goebel LGA, Sousa MRD, Gusmão AC, Costa TMD, Jesus ADS, Cavalcante T. Expansão da área de ocorrência do lobo-guará, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Carnivora, Canidae) no bioma Amazônico. Oecologia Australis. 2020; 24(4): 937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2404.15
23. Gusmão AC, Evangelista-Vale JC, Pires-Oliveira JC, Barnett AA, Da Silva OD. New records and modelling the impacts of climate change on the black-tailed marmosets. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(9): e0256270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256270
24. Pommer-Barbosa RAP, Oliveira MA. New records and range extension of Euphractus sexcinctus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Cingulata, Chlamyphoridae) in Rondônia state, Brazil. Check List. 2022; 18(2): 265–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/18.2.265
25. Ferreira DSD, Oliveira MA, Goebel LGA, Andriolo A, Pommer-Barbosa RA, Mattos FDS, Barnett AA. Records of Crab-eating fox Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766) (Carnivora, Canidae) in Rondônia, Brazil. Mammalia. 2023; 87(6): 577–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2023-0011
26. Gusmão AC, Messias MR, Carneiro JC, Schneider H, Alencar TB, Calouro AM. A new species of titi monkey, Plecturocebus Byrne et al. 2016 (Primates, Pitheciidae), from southwestern Amazonia, Brazil. Primate Conservation. 2019; 33: 1–15.
27. Saldanha J, Semedo TBF, Mendonça RFB, Lima-Silva LG, Messias MR, Sampaio I, Brandão MV, Rossi RV. Unveiling hidden diversity of Oecomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Brazilian Central Amazonia: description of a new species and new lineages. Systematics and Biodiversity. 2023; 21(1): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2023.2259037
28. Santos PM, Bocchiglieri A, Chiarello AG, Paglia AP, Moreira A, de Souza AC et al. NEOTROPICAL XENARTHRANS: a data set of occurrence of xenarthran species in the Neotropics. Ecology. 2019; 100(2): e02663.
29. Nagy-Reis M, Oshima JEDF, Kanda CZ, Palmeira FBL, de Melo FR, Morato RG et al. NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics. Ecology. 2020; 101(1): e02961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1797
30. Brazil. Reserva Biológica do Jaru. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Brasília; 2010. 90 p.
31. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, De Moraes G, Leonardo J, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2014; 22(6): 711–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
32. Peres CA. General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates. Neotropical Primates. 1999; 7(1): 11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62015/np.1999.v7.414
33. Benchimol M, Peres CA. Predicting local extinctions of Amazonian vertebrates in forest islands created by a mega dam. Biological Conservation. 2015; 187: 61–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.005
34. Abreu-Jr EF, Costa GC, Peres CA, Lima AP. Lista de Mamíferos do Brasil 2023. Comitê de Taxonomia da Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia (CT-SBMz); 2023. Available in: https://zenodo.org/records/10428436.
35. Byrne H, Rylands AB, Carneiro JC, Alfaro JWL, Bertuol F, Da Silva MN et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the New World titi monkeys (Callicebus): first appraisal of taxonomy based on molecular evidence. Frontiers in zoology. 2016; 13:1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-016-0142-4
36. Rylands AB, Heymann EW, Lynch Alfaro J, Buckner JC, Roos C, Matauschek C, Boubli JP, Sampaio RS, Mittermeier RA. Taxonomic review of the new world tamarins (primates: Callitrichidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2016; 177(4): 1003–1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12386
37. Morales-Donoso JA, Vacari GQ, Bernegossi AM, Sandoval EDP, Peres PHF, Galindo DJ, de Thoisy B, Vozdova M, Kubickova S, Barbanti Duarte JM. Revalidation of Passalites Gloger, 1841 for the Amazon brown brocket deer P. nemorivagus (Cuvier, 1817) (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Cervidae). ZooKeys. 2023; 1167: 241–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1167.100577
38. Teta P, Reyes-Amaya N. Uncovering species boundaries through qualitative and quantitative morphology in the genus Dasyprocta (Rodentia, Caviomorpha), with emphasis in D. punctata and D. variegata. Journal of Mammalogy. 2021; 102(6): 1548–1563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab101
39. Feijó A, Cordeiro-Estrela P. Taxonomic revision of the Dasypus kappleri complex, with revalidations of Dasypus pastasae (Thomas, 1901) and Dasypus beniensis Lönnberg, 1942 (Cingulata, Dasypodidae). Zootaxa. 2019; 4170(2): 271–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.3
40. Aya-Cuero CA, Mosquera-Guerra F, Castillo C, Esquivel DA, Rojano C, Feijó A. Ecological aspects of Dasypus pastasae in the Colombian Altillanura, with comments on activity patterns and its identification via camera traps. Mastozoología Neotropical. 2021; 28(2).
41. IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1. [cited in 2025 Apr 28]. Available in: https://www.iucnredlist.org.
42. ICMBio. Sistema de Avaliação do Risco de Extinção da Biodiversidade – SALVE. 2025 [Accessed on 12 October 2025]. Available in: https://salve.icmbio.gov.br/.
43. Projeto MapBiomas. Coleção [7.1] da Série Anual de Mapas de Uso e Cobertura da Terra do Brasil. [Accessed on 22 August 2023]. Available in: https://mapbiomas.org/.
44. PRIMAP - Banco de Dados Geográficos ICMBio/CPB. 2022. [Accessed on 22 August 2023]. Available in: https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/.
45. Rocha DG, Ferraz KMPMB, Gonçalves L, Tan CKW, Lemos FG, Ortiz C. Wild dogs at stake: deforestation threatens the only Amazon endemic canid, the short-eared dog (Atelocynus microtis). Royal Society Open Science. 2020; 7(4): 190717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190717
46. Mazzolli M, Hammer MLA. Qualidade de ambiente para a onça-pintada, puma e jaguatirica na Baía de Guaratuba, Estado do Paraná, utilizando os aplicativos Capture e Presence. Revista Biotemas. 2008;21(2):75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2008v21n2p105
47. Tirelli FP, Freitas TR, Michalski F, Percequillo AR, Eizirik E. Using reliable predator identification to investigate feeding habits of Neotropical carnivores (Mammalia, Carnivora) in a deforestation frontier of the Brazilian Amazon. Mammalia. 2019; 83(5): 415–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2018-0106
48. Quadros J, Mazzolli M. Hábito alimentar e interferência antrópica na atividade de marcação territorial do Puma concolor e Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) e outros carnívoros na Estação Ecológica de Juréia-Itatins, São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 2008; 25: 427–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752008000300007
49. Pires MM, Benchimol M, Cruz LR, Peres CA. Terrestrial food web complexity in Amazonian forests decays with habitat loss. Current Biology. 2023; 33(2): 389–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.066
50. Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJ, Collen B. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science. 2014; 345(6195): 401–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817
51. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114(30): E6089–E6096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
52. Goebel LGA. Body mass determines the role of mammal species in a frugivore-large fruit interaction network in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2023; 39: e12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467422000505
53. Bogoni JA, Peres CA, Ferraz KM. Medium-to large-bodied mammal surveys across the Neotropics are heavily biased against the most faunally intact assemblages. Mammal Review. 2022; 52(2): 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12274
54. Reis YMS, Benchimol M. Effectiveness of community-based monitoring projects of terrestrial game fauna in the tropics: a global review. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 2023; 21(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.03.005
55. Fragoso JM, Peres CA, Silveira L, Oliveira-Santos LG. Line transect surveys underdetect terrestrial mammals: implications for the sustainability of subsistence hunting. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(4): e0152659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152659
56. Ponce-Martins M, Lima-Ribeiro MS, Oliveira-Santos LG, Costa GC. Assessing the contribution of local experts in monitoring Neotropical vertebrates with camera traps, linear transects and track and sign surveys in the Amazon. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 2022; 20(4): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.08.007
57. Mendes-Oliveira AC, Costa GC, Lima-Ribeiro MS, Oliveira-Santos LG. Oil palm monoculture induces drastic erosion of an Amazonian forest mammal fauna. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12(11): e0187650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187650
58. Ripple WJ, Newsome TM, Wolf C, Dirzo, R, Everatt KT, Galetti M et al. Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Science advances. 2015; 1(4): e1400103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400103
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Esta obra está licenciada bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor de las obras publicadas, que pueden reutilizarse y difundirse en otros medios, siempre que se cite la fuente original de la publicación (revista Biodiversidade Brasileira).
