Financial Analysis of the Production of Cernambi in the Tapajós National Forest with the Green Value Tool

Authors

  • Shoana Humphries Green Value, Berkeley/CA, Estados Unidos. CEP: 94703
  • Stella Schons Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University/Virginia Tech, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation/FREC, Blacksburg/VA, Estados Unidos. CEP: 24061.
  • Dárlison Fernandes Carvalho de Andrade Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Coordenação de Monitoramento da Biodiversidade/COMOB, Brasília/DF, Brasil. CEP: 70670-350.
  • Roberta Amaral de Andrade Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil/IEB (colaboradora de 2010 a 2014), Escritório Regional do Sul do Amazonas, Brasília/DF. Brasil. CEP 70863-520
  • Abidon Serrão Farias Cooperativa Mista da Flona do Tapajós/Coomflona, Santarém/PA, Brasil. CEP: 68040-000
  • Leo Eduardo de Campos Ferreira IMAFLORA, Piracicaba/SP. CEP: 13426-420.
  • David McGrath Earth Innovation Institute, Berkley/CA, Estados Unidos. CEP: 94702
  • Arimar Feitosa Rodriguez Cooperativa Mista da Flona do Tapajós/Coomflona, Santarém/PA, Brasil. CEP: 68040-000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v12i5.1903

Keywords:

Rubber, Amazonia, Western Pará

Abstract

The sale of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by forest-dependent, traditional families in the Brazilian Amazon is an important source of family income. Cooperatives are increasingly supporting this activity through technical assistance and/or help accessing markets. Scarce information exists, however, on the costs and income generated from NTFP extraction for individual producers or for the support programs implemented by cooperatives. Nonetheless, this information is essential for operational planning and future decision making, as well as the financial sustainability of these activities. We present a financial analysis of the production of cernambi (coagulated natural rubber extracted from the tree species Hevea brasiliensis M. Arg.) by families living in and around the Tapajós National Forest in the western region of Pará state, and the sale of the rubber by the Tapajós National Forest Mixed Cooperative (Coomflona), which also provides technical assistance to the families. The analysis was carried out with an individual rubber tapper and members of the Coomflona cooperative based on a methodology developed specifically for use by community-based forest enterprises and their partner organizations. Our results show that the production of cernambi, at the time of the analysis, was profitable and constituted an important source of income for the producer family. However, the profitability of the producer depended on the support of Coomflona in the marketing and product collection stages – for which the profitability proved to be negative. The analysis allowed the evaluation of several alternative scenarios as well as the identification of production bottlenecks and a discussion of potential solutions. 

References

Allegretti MA. Construção social de políticas públicas.Chico Mendes e o movimento dos seringueiros. Desenvolvimento e meio ambiente, 18, 2008.

Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Börner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development, 64, S12-S28, 2014.

Belcher B, Ruíz-Pérez M, Achdiawan R. Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation. World Development 33(9): 1435-1452, 2005.

Bacha CJC, Rodriguez LCE. Profitability and social impacts of reduced impact logging in the Tapajós National Forest, Brazil – a case study. Ecological Economics, 63: 70-77, 2007.

Sá CP, Oliveira EL, Nascimento GC. 2004. Custo e rentabilidade do sistema extrativo para produção de borracha nas reservas extrativistas no Acre. Embrapa Acre-Comunicado Técnico (INFOTECA-E). 4p.

Souza RJ, Lindo PVF. Integração econômica da Amazônia no contexto de um Brasil dual: do ciclo da borracha à implantação da rodovia BR-163. Formação, 1(16): 70-83, 2009.

Feitosa OM, Saes AM. O plano de defesa da borracha: entre o desenvolvimentismo e a negligência política ao Norte do Brasil, 1900-1915. América Latina en la história económica, 20(3): 138-168, 2013.

Giraldo CJ. 2014. Viabilidade de sistemas produtivos de borracha natural na Amazônia: o caso do extrativismo na Resex Chico Mendes. Tese (Doutorado em Meteorologia Agrícola). Universidade Federal de Viçosa. 65p.

Humphries S, Holmes T, Kainer K, Gonçalves Koury CG, Cruz E, Miranda Rocha R. Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 77: 62-73, 2012.

Humphries S, Holmes P. 2014. Green Value: a tool for simplified financial analysis of forest-based initiatives. Earth Innovation Institute e USDA Forest Service: San Francisco. 120p.

Humphries S, Holmes T. 2015. Financial analysis of community-based forest enterprises with the green value tool. P. 2949-2966. In: L. Pancel and M. Kohl (orgs.). Tropical Forestry Handbook (2nd edition). Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 3633p.

Humphries S, McGrath D, Andrade D. 2015. Coomflona – A successful community-based forest enterprise in Brazil, p. 61-84. In: Macqueen D, Bolin A, Greijmans M (orgs.). Democratising forest business: a compendium of successful locally controlled forest business organisations. IIED. 512p.

Humphries S, Holmes T, de Andrade DFC, McGrath D, Dantas JB. Searching for win-win forest outcomes: Learning-by-doing, financial viability, and income growth for a community-based forest management cooperative in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 125, 104336, 2020.

IBAMA. 2004. Floresta Nacional do Tapajós: Plano de Manejo, Volume 1. www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/imgs-unidades-coservacao/flona_tapajoss.pdf . Acesso em: 08/01/2020.

Júnior, JBRP, Pimentel LC, Júnior FP. 2019. A borracha e a história da Amazônia, p.39-46. In: Anais do II Fórum Internacional sobre a Amazônia, 39, 1778p.

Kamwi JM, Endjala J, Siyambango N. Dependency of rural communities on non-timber forest products in the dry lands of southern Africa: A case of Mukwe Constituency, Kavango East Region, Namibia. Trees, Forests and People, 2: 100022, 2020.

Lopes E, Soares-Filho B, Souza F, Rajão R, Merry F, Ribeiro SC. Mapping the socio-ecology of Non Timber Forest Products (NTFP) extraction in the Brazilian Amazon: The case of açaí (Euterpe precatoria Mart) in Acre. Landscape and Urban Planning, 188: 110-117, 2019.

Medina G, Pokorny B. Avaliação financeira de manejo florestal comunitário. Novos Cadernos, 14(2): 25-36, 2011.

O’Connor A, Sunderland, T C H. 2020. Non-timber forest products from tropical forests, p. 171-188. In: Blaser J, Hardcastle, PD (orgs.). Achieving sustainable management of tropical forests. Burleigh Dodds. 716p.

Radachowsky J, RamosVH, McNab R, Baur EH, Kazakov N.. Forest concessions in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: A decade later. Forest Ecology and Management, 268:18-28, 2012.

Russell JA. 1942. Fordlandia and Belterra, rubber plantations on the Tapajos river, Brazil. Economic Geography. 18(2):125-145.

Sabogal C, Pokorny W, Louman B. 2008. Manejo forestal comunitario en América Latina: experiencias, lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro. Cifor. 156p.

Schroth G, Moraes VHDF, Mota MSS. Increasing the profitability of traditional, planted rubber agroforests at the Tapajós river, Brazilian Amazon. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 102(3): 319-339, 2004.

Shackleton CM, Vos A. How many people globally actually use non-timber forest products? Forest Policy and Economics. 135: 102659, 2022.

World Bank. 2004. Sustaining forests: a development strategy. The World Bank.

Published

01/11/2022

Issue

Section

Manejo Comunitário de Recursos Naturais em Unidades de Conservação