Remote Construction Process of the National Action Plan for the Conservation of Endangered Pollinating Insects

Authors

  • Hannah Cascelli Farinasso Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação da Biodiversidade do Cerrado e Restauração Ecológica/CBC, Brasília/DF, Brasil. CEP: 70.635-800.
  • Lucas Benicio de Castro Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri/UFVJM, Centro de Estudos Avançados no Funcionamento de Sistemas Ecológicos e Interações/CAFESIN-MULTIFLOR, Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Montes Claros/MG, Brasil. CEP: 39.100-000.
  • André Rodrigo Rech Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri/UFVJM, Centro de Estudos Avançados no Funcionamento de Sistemas Ecológicos e Interações/CAFESIN-MULTIFLOR, Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Montes Claros/MG, Brasil. CEP: 39.100-000.
  • Helder Canto Resende Universidade Federal de Viçosa/UFV, Laboratório de Genética da Conservação/LaBee, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, campus Florestal. Florestal/MG, Brasil. CEP: 35.690-000.
  • Cintia Lepesqueur Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Coordenação de Identificação e Planejamento de Ações para Conservação/COPAN, Brasília/DF, Brasil. CEP: 70.670-350.
  • Ana Carolina Moreira Martins Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Coordenação de Identificação e Planejamento de Ações para Conservação/COPAN, Brasília/DF, Brasil. CEP: 70.670-350.
  • Walter Steenbock Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação da Biodiversidade Marinha do Sudeste e Sul/CEPSUL, Itajaí/SC, Brasil. CEP: 88.301-445.
  • Juliana Hipólito Universidade Federal da Bahia/UFBA, Instituto de Biologia, Salvador/BA, Brasil. CEP: 40.170-115.
  • Favízia Freitas de Oliveira Universidade Federal da Bahia/UFBA, Instituto de Biologia, Salvador/BA, Brasil. CEP: 40.170-115.
  • Onildo J Marini-Filho Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação da Biodiversidade do Cerrado e Restauração Ecológica/CBC, Brasília/DF, Brasil. CEP: 70.635-800.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v13i4.2273

Keywords:

Virtual workshops , public policies , terrestrial invertebrates

Abstract

The national action plans (PANs) are an important tool for biodiversity conservation of endangered fauna. This work aims to analyze the process of elaboration of the PAN Insect Pollinators, carried out in a virtual format for the first time, in the context of the PANs (due to health restrictions during the period of the Covid-19 pandemic). Specifically, we seek to answer the following questions: 1) What adaptations were developed for the virtual methodology? 2) What results were achieved by remote construction? 3) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the virtual environment? 4) How can the virtual format contribute to the next PANs? The methodology was based on online meetings and asynchronous activities, using tools such as forms, digital whiteboards, and shared spreadsheets. After the meetings, evaluation forms were applied to collect the participants' impressions and suggestions of improvements to the method. Overall, the virtual format was well accepted by the participants and it was possible to meet the requirements for the Plan's validation. The participation of a support team with experience in PANs and the availability to prepare the material for virtual meetings proved to be indispensable to achieve the objectives. The virtual format brought advantages, such as low cost, a larger number of contributors, and objectivity regarding the use of time. As disadvantages, we observed less involvement from the participants and less enriching facilitation dynamics. It is worth mentioning that the virtual model developed here for the elaboration of PANs can be used or adapted for future PANs.

References

Blanchard AL. The effects of COVID-19 on virtual working within online groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24(2) 290-296, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983446

Gamborg C, Palmer C, Sandoe P. Ethics of wildlife management and conservation: what should we try to protect. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10): 1-8, 2012.

Garibaldi LA, et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339: 1608-1611, 2013.

Geilfus F, 2002. 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: diagnóstico, planificación, monitoreo, evaluación. IICA. 217 p.

Gorlick A, 2020. The productivity pitfalls of working from home in the age of COVID-19, Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/2020/03/30/productivity-pitfalls-working-home-age-covid-19/. Acesso em: 12/05/2022.

Hipólito J, Coutinho J, Mahlmann T, Santana TBR, Magnusson WE. Legislation and pollination: recommendations for policymakers and scientists. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 19(1): 1-9, 2021.

ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade). 2018. Guia para gestão de planos de ação nacional para a conservação das espécies ameaçadas de extinção: PAN - elabore - monitore – avalie. Brasília: ICMBio, 160p.

IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2016. The assessment report on pollinators, pollination and food production. 552p. <https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/2017_pollination_full_report_book_v12_pages.pdf>. Acesso em: 09/05/2022.

Klein AM, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274: 303-313, 2007.

Millard J, et al. Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity. Nature Communications, 12(1): 1-11, 2021.

MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 1999. International Pollinators Initiative: The São Paulo Declaration on Pollinators. Report on the Recommendations of the Workshop on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Pollinators in Agriculture with Emphasis on Bee. 79p. Disponível em: https://www.cbd.int/doc/ref/agr-pollinator-rpt.pdf

MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2014a. Portaria nº 444, de 17 de dezembro de 2014. Lista Nacional Oficial de Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção. Brasília: DOU de 18/12/2014.

MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2014b. Portaria nº 445, de 17 de dezembro de 2014. Lista Nacional Oficial de Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção. Brasília: DOU de 18/12/2014.

Morikawa M, 2020. COVID-19, teleworking, and productivity, VoxEU.org, https://voxeu.org/article/covid-19-teleworking-and-productivity

OECD. 2020. Supporting people and companies to deal with the COVID-19 virus: Options for an immediate employment and social-policy response. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/supporting-people-and-companies-to-deal-with-the-covid-19-virus-options-for-an-immediate-employment-and-social-policy-response-d33dffe6/. Acesso em: 12/05/2022.

Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(6): 345-353, 2010.

Senapathi D, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze TD, Kleijn D, Potts SG, Carvalheiro LG. Pollinator conservation - the difference between managing for pollination services and preserving pollinator diversity. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 12: 93-101, 2015.

Steenbock W & Medeiros RP (orgs.). 2017. Manual de avaliação e monitoramento socioeconômico para a gestão de recifes de coral. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. 274p.

Vercillo UE, 2021. Os Planos de Ação para Conservação de Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção no Brasil: história e análise de resultados (2004-2019). Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável). Universidade de Brasília. 99p. Disponível em: https://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/41672/1/2021_UgoEichlerVercillo.pdf

Published

16/11/2023

Issue

Section

Planos de Ação Nacional para Conservação de Espécies Ameaçadas de Extinção