Monitoramento de borboletas: o papel de um indicador biológico na gestão de unidades de conservação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v6i1.569Keywords:
bioindicators, conservation effectiveness, diversity, protected areasAbstract
Monitoring programs constitute a suitable approach to evaluate habitat quality over time.
Nonetheless, the success of such programs rests on data quality and adequacy of management practices. Longterm monitoring should be used to generate robust data that can be used as baseline information for effective implementation of mitigating actions. Although monitoring initiatives have produced successful results in
temperate regions, their replication is Brazil is particularly challenging due to this country’s high diversity and land extension. The expansion of activities that promote economic growth is a real threat to environmental protection. As a result, habitat Conservation units in Brazil are under pressure, thus compromising their effectiveness as protected areas that conserve natural habitats. In this paper, we explain why butterflies are a reliable group as biological indicators for environmental monitoring programs. Additionally, we discuss how butterflies may be used in the management of Conservation Units and environmental monitoring in
local scales, using the Program “Programa de Monitoramento in situ da Biodiversidade” as an example. We believe that butterflies can serve a flagship group for the maintenance of such programs in Brazil by providinga means of obtaining reliable data, and also being a link between conservation biologists and members of the society. This can be achieved through activities such as the direct contact with butterflies, and integration of laypeople in programs that involve collecting data for monitoring programs.
References
Adams, W.M.; Aveling, R.; Brockington, D.; Dickson, B.; Elliott, J.; Hutton, J.; Roe, D.; Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306: 1146-1149.
Aguiar, A.P.; Santos, B.F.; Couri, M.S.; Rafael, J.A.; Costa, C.; Ide, S.; Duarte, M.; Grazia, J.; Schwertner, C.F.; Freitas, A.V.L. & Azevedo, C.O. 2008. Diagnóstico e diretrizes para o estudo da entomodiversidade brasileira. In: Rocha, R. & Boeger, W.A.P (orgs.). Estado da arte e perspectivas da zoologia no Brasil. Editora da UFPR. Curitiba.
Beccaloni, G.W.; Viloria, A.L.; Hall, S.A. & Robinson, G.S. 2008. Catalogue of the hostplants of the Neotropical butterflies. M3M, Zaragoza.
Bonebrake, T.C.; Ponisio, L.C.; Boggs, C.L. & Ehrlich, P.R. 2010. More than just indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biological Conservation, 143: 1831-1841 Bonito Informa 2015. Serra da Bodoquena recebe 600 inscrições para monitoramento, confira os selecionados.
Bonito Informa. http://www.bonitoinforma.com.br/cidades/serra-da-bodoquena-recebe-600- inscricoes-para-monitoramento/16871/. Acesso em (10 de abril de 2015).
Brito, M.M.; Ribeiro, D.B.; Raniero, M.; Hasui, E.; Ramos, F.N. & Arab A. 2014. Functional composition and phenology of fruit-feeding butterflies in a fragmented landscape: variation of seasonality between habitat specialists. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(4): 547-560., Alaska. Arctic, 54(1): 41-48.
Brown Jr., K.S. 1991. Conservation of neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins N.M. & Thomas J.A. (eds). The conservation of insects and their habitats. 15th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, September 1989. Pp. 349-401. Academic Press, London.
Brown Jr., K.S. 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, hábitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. Pp. 142-187. In: Morellato, L.P.C. (Org.). História natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservação de uma área no sudeste do Brasil. Editora da UNICAMP/FAPESP. Campinas, São Paulo. 321 p.
Brown Jr., K.S. 1997. Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical forests: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1: 25-42.
Brown Jr., K.S. 2005. Geologic, evolutionary, and ecological bases of the diversification of neotropical butterflies: implications for conservation. pp. 166-201. In: Bermingham, E.; Dick, C.W. & Moritz, G. (Eds.). Tropical rainforests: past, present, and future. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. USA. ix + 745 p.
Brown Jr., K.S. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2000. Atlantic Forest Butterflies: Indicators for Landscape Conservation. Biotropica, 32(4b): 934-956.
Chown, S. & McGeoch, M. 2011. Measuring biodiversity in managed landscapes. Pp. 252-264. In: Magurran, A. & McGill, B. (Eds.). Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press.
Costa-Pereira, R.; Roque, F.O.; Constantino, P.A.L.; Sabino, J. & Uehara-Prado, M. 2013. Monitoramento in situ da biodiversidade. proposta para um sistema brasileiro de monitoramento da biodiversidade. ICMBio, 61p.
D´Abrera, B. 1984. Butterflies of the Neotropical Region. Part II. Danaidae, Ithomiidae, Heliconiidae and Morphidae. Victoria: Hill House: XII + 173- 384.
Devictor, V.; van Swaay, C.; Brereton, T.; Brotons, L.; Chamberlain, D.; Heliölä, J.; Herrando, S.; Julliard, R.; Kuussaari, M.; Lindström, A.; Reif, J.; Roy, D.B.; Schweiger, O.; Settele, J.; Stefanescu, C.; Van Strien, A.; Van Turnhout, C.; Vermouzek, Z.; WallisDeVries, M.; Wynhoff, I. & Jiguet, F. 2012. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Climate Change, 2: 121-124.
DeVries, P.J. 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history, Volume 1: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton, US.
DeVries, P.; Austin, G.T. & Martin, N.H. 2009. Estimating species diversity in a guild of Neotropical skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) with artificial lures is a sampling problem. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2(2): 125-134.
Duarte, M.; Marconato, G.; Specht, A. & Casagrande, M.M. 2014. Lepidoptera. Cap. 37. In. Rafael, J.A.; Melo, G.A.R.; Carvalho, C.J.B.; Casari, S.A. & Constantino, R. Insetos do Brasil. Editora Holos, São Paulo.
Fermon, H.; Waltert, M. & Mühlenberg, M. 2003. Movement and vertical stratification of fruit-feeding butterflies in a managed West African rainforest. Journal of Insect Conservation, 7: 7-19.
FOEM, 2010. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment. Biodiversity Monitoring Switzerland. http://www. biodiversitymonitoring.ch/english/indikatoren/z3.php
Forister, M.L. & Shapiro, A.M. 2003. Climatic trends and advancing spring flight of butterflies in lowland California. Global Change Biology, 9: 1130-1135.
Freitas, A.V.L. 2010. Impactos potenciais das mudanças propostas no Código Florestal Brasileiro sobre as borboletas. Biota Neotropica, 10(4): 53-58.
Freitas, A.V.L. & Marini-Filho, O.J. 2011. Plano de ação nacional para conservação dos lepidópteros ameaçados de extinção. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasília 122pp.
Freitas, A.V.L.; Francini, R.B. & Brown Jr., K.S. 2003. Insetos como indicadores ambientais. Capítulo 5 In Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre (L. Cullen Jr.; C. Valladares-Pádua & R. Rudran, orgs.). Editora da UFPR, p. 125-151.
Freitas, A.V.L.; Iserhard, C.A.; Santos, J.P.; Carreira, J.Y.O.; Ribeiro, D.B.; Melo, D.H.A.; Rosa, A.H.B.; Marini-Filho, O.J.; Accacio, G.M. & Uehara-Prado, M. 2014. Studies with butterfly bait traps: an overview. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 40(2): 209-218.
Santos, J.P.; Freitas, A.V.L.; Constantino, P.A.L. & Uehara-Prado, M. 2014b. Guia de identificação de tribos de borboletas frugívoras. Cerrado. In: Pereira, A.B. & Constantino, P.A.L. (eds.). Monitoramento de Biodiversidade. MMA/ICMBio/GIZ. Brasília. Brazil. 12 p.
Santos, J.P.; Freitas, A.V.L.; Constantino, P.A.L. & Uehara-Prado, M. 2014c. Guia de identificação de tribos de borboletas frugívoras. Mata Atlântica - Norte. In: Pereira, A.B. & Constantino, P.A.L. (eds.). Monitoramento de Biodiversidade. MMA/ICMBio/GIZ. Brasília. Brazil. 12 p.
Santos, J.P.; Freitas, A.V.L.; Constantino, P.A.L. & Uehara-Prado, M. 2014d. Guia de identificação de tribos de borboletas frugívoras. Mata Atlântica - Sul. In: Pereira, A.B. & Constantino, P.A.L. (eds.). Monitoramento de Biodiversidade. MMA/ICMBio/GIZ. Brasília. Brazil. 12 p.
Sauberer, N.; Zulka, K.P.; Abensperg-Traun, M.; Berg, H.; Bieringer, G.; Milasowszky, N.; Moser, D.; Plutzar, C.; Pollheimer, M.; Storch, C.; Tröstl, R.; Zechmeister, H. & Grabherr G. 2004. Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biological Conservation, 117: 181-190.
Schulze, E.D. & Mooney, H. 1993. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Ecological Studies no. 99.
Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. Silva-Brandão, K.L. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2011. Capítulo 8. Interações entre borboletas e plantas. In: Ecologia das Interações Plantas-Animais: Uma abordagem ecológico-evolutiva. Del-Claro, K. & TorezanSilingardi H.M. (eds). Technical Books Editora, Rio de Janeiro. Pp: 171-180.
Soga, M.; Kawahara, T.; Fukuyama, K.; Sayama, K.; Kato, T.; Shimomura, M.; Itoh, T.; Yoshida, T. & Ozaki, K. 2015. Landscape versus local factors shaping butterfly communities in fragmented landscapes: Does host plant diversity matter? Journal of Insect Conservation, 19: 781-790.
Sparrow, H.R.; Sisk, T.D.; Ehrlich, P.R. & Murphy, D.D. 1994. Techniques and guidelines for monitoring neotropical butterflies. Conservation Biology, 8: 800-809.
Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. 2010. Arguments for protected areas: multiple benefits for conservation and use. Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (eds). Routledge, United Kingdom, 274 p.
Sweaney, N.; Lindenmayer, B.D. & Driscoll, D.A. 2014. Is the matrix important to butterflies in fragmented landscapes? Journal of Insect Conservation, 18: 283-294.
Thomas, J.A. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360: 339-357.
Uehara-Prado, M.; Freitas, A.V.L.; Francini, R.B. & Brown Jr., K.S. 2004. Guia das borboletas frugívoras da Reserva Estadual do Morro Grande e região de Caucaia do Alto, Cotia (SP). Biota Neotropica, 4(1): 1-25.
Uehara-Prado, M.; Fernandes, J.O.; Bello, A.M.; Machado, G.; Santos, A.J.; Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z. & Freitas, A.V.L. 2009. Selecting terrestrial arthropods as indicators of small-scale disturbance: a first approach in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation, 142(6): 1220-1228.
US Fish and Wildlife Service 1998. Recovery plan for the El Segundo blue butterfly (Euphilotes battoides allyni). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
van Swaay, C.A.M.; Maes, D. & Plate, C. 1997. Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands and Flanders: the first results. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1: 81-87.
van Swaay, C.A.M.; Warren, M. & Lois, G. 2006. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation, 10: 189-209.
van Swaay C.A.M.; Nowicki, P.; Settele, J. & van Strien, A.J. 2008. Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17: 3455-3469.
van Swaay, C.; Regan, E.; Ling, M.; Bozhinovska, E.; Fernandez, M.; Huertas, B.; Phon, C.K.; K”orösi, A.; Marini-Filho, O.J.; Meerman, J.; Pe’er, G.; Sáfián, S.; Sam, L.; Shuey, J.; Taron, D.; Terblanche, R.; UeharaPrado, M. & Underhill, L. 2015. Guidelines for standardised global butterfly monitoring. Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, Leipzig, Germany. GEO BON Technical Series 1, 32pp.
Warren, M. 1997. Conserving Lepidoptera in a changing environment: a perspective from western Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1: i–iv.
Warren, M.S.; Hill, J.K.; Thomas, J.A.; Asher, J.; Fox, R.; Huntley, B.; Roy, D.B.; Telfer, M.G.; Jeffcoate, S.; Harding, P.; Jeffcoate, G.; Willis, S.G.; Greatorex-Davies, J.N.; Moss, D. & Thomas, C.D. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature, 414: 65-69.
Watson, J.E.M.; Dudley, N.; Segan, D.B. & Hockings M. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515: 67-73.
Wahlberg, N.; Leneveu, J.; Kodandaramaiah, U.; Peña, C.; Nylin, S.; Freitas, A.V.L. & Brower, A.V.Z. 2009. Nymphalidae butterflies diversify following near demise at the cretaceous/tertiary boundary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276: 4295-4302.
Zografou, K.; Sfenthourakis, S.; Pullin, A. & Kati, V. 2009. On the surrogate value of red-listed butterflies for butterflies and grasshoppers: a case study in Grammos site of Natura 2000, Greece. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13: 505-514.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.
v3-3-0-3-2-1-8-release.27