Community Structure of Dung Beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in The Atlantic Forest of the Reserva Natural Vale (Linhares, Espírito Santo, Brazil)

Autores

  • Renan C. Lima Laboratório de Entomologia e Fitopatologia/LEF, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias/CCTA, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro/UENF, Campos dos Goytacazes/RJ, Brazil.
  • Magali Hoffmann Laboratório de Entomologia e Fitopatologia/LEF, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias/CCTA, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro/UENF, Campos dos Goytacazes/RJ, Brazil.
  • Ricardo Eduardo Vicente Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Laboratório de Ecologia de Comunidades

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v12i4.2186

Palavras-chave:

Biodiversity, baited pitfall-trap, coleoptera, neotropics

Resumo

There are 7000 species of Scarabaeinae beetles that can be divided into four functional guilds. The aim of this work was to describe the Scarabaeinae community, its functional guilds and fluctuation throughout the year at two sites in the Reserva Natural Vale, municipality of Linhares, Espírito Santo state, Brazil. The samples were carried out monthly, from June 2012 to January 2013, with pitfall traps exposed for 48 hours with human faeces and rotten pig baits. Comparisons between the areas were made through abundance analysis and species richness, besides relating the feeding guilds and nesting of the captured species. A total of 9039 specimens were collected, distributed in 16 genera and 34 species. The most abundant species were Dichotomius (Selenocopris) irinus (Harold, 1867) with 34.5%, Aphengium cupreum Shipp, 1897 with 24.5% and Canthon (Peltecanthon) staigi (Pereira, 1953) with 21.3%. Nine species were recorded in all samples, with 88% of the total species captured during the study. Two out of three most abundant species, D. irinus and A. cupreum were dominant in the dry season. C. staigi was the most abundant in rainy season. Human feces trap was the most effective. In relation to trophic guild, most species were considered specialist. Regarding nesting behavior, the majority are paracoprids, standard pattern of Neotropical region. 

Referências

Almeida SSP, Louzada JNC. Estrutura da comunidade de Scarabaeinae (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) em fitofisionomias do Cerrado e sua importância para a conservação. Neotropical Entomology, 38: 32-43, 2009. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2009000100003

Andresen E. Effects of season and vegetation type on community organization of dung beetles in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica, 37(2): 291–300, 2005. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00039.x

Arruda FV, Teresa FB, Layme VM, Vicente RE, Camarota F, Izzo TJ. Fire and flood: How the Pantanal ant communities respond to multiple disturbances? Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2022.04.002

Basset Y, et al. Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science, 338(6113): 1481-1484, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226727

Cajaiba RL, Périco E, Silva WB. Attraction of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to different baits in the Brazilian Amazon region. Revista de Biología Tropical, 65: 917-924, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i3.29433

Cambefort Y, Hanski I. 1991. Dung beetle population biology, p. 36-50. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (Eds.). Dung beetle ecology. Cambridge: Princeton University Press. 481p. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400006489

Campos RC, Hernández MIM. Dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) in Atlantic forest fragments in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 57: 47-54, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013000100008

Celi J, Tuneus E, Torres J, Ortega M. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) diversity in an altitudinal gradient in the Cutucú range, Morona Santiago, Ecuadorian Amazon. Lyonia, 7(2): 37-52, 2004.

Chamorro W, Marin-Armijos D. Scarabaeinae dung beetles from Ecuador: a catalog, nomenclatural acts, and distribution records. ZooKeys, 826: 1-343. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488

Colwell RK. 2009. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2.0. User’s Guide and application.

Costa CMQ, Silva FAB, Farias AI, Moura RC. Diversidade de Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) coletados com armadilha de interceptação de voo no Refúgio Ecológico Charles Darwin, Igarassu-PE, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53: 88-94, 2009. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262009000100021.

Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL. The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 17: 133-146. 2012

Dirzo R, Raven PH. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28: 137-167, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532

Doube BMA. Functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages. Ecological Entomology, 15: 371-383, 1990. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1990.tb00820.x

Endres AA, Creão-Duarte AJ, Hernández MIM. Diversidade de Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera) da Reserva Biológica Guaribas, Mamanguape, Paraíba, Brasil: uma comparação entre Mata Atlântica e Tabuleiro Nordestino. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 51: 67-71, 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262007000100012.

Falqueto SA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Schoereder JH. Are fungivorous Scarabaeidae less specialist? Ecological Society of Australia, 15: 17-22, 2005.

Favila ME, Halffter G. 1997. The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 72: 1-25.

Fernández F, Guerrero RJ, Delsinne T. 2019. Hormigas de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Bogotá, Colombia.

Filgueiras BKC, Liberal CN, Aguiar CDM, Hernández MIM, Iannuzzi L. Attractivity of omnivore, carnivore and herbivore mammalian dung to Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in a tropical Atlantic rainforest remnant. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53: 422-427, 2009. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262009000300017

Fraga CN, et al. 2019. Lista da fauna e flora ameaçadas de extinção no estado do Espírito Santo, p. 342-419. In: Fraga CN, Formigoni MH, Chaves FG. (orgs). Fauna e flora ameaçadas de extinção no estado do Espírito Santo. Santa Teresa, Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica.432p.

García LE, Moraes RM, Vianna EES. Levantamento de besouros copro-necrófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) do Bioma Pampa. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, 15(2): 144-154, 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5965/223811711522016144

Halffter G, Arellano L. Response of dung beetle diversity to human-induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica, 34: 144-154, 2002. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00250.x

Halffter G, Edmonds WD. 1982. The nesting behavior of dung beetles Scarabaeinae): An ecologic and evolutive approach. México, D.F., Man and Biosphere Program UNESCO. 177p.

Halffter G, Favila ME. The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analyzing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biology International, 27: 15-21, 1993.

Halffter G, Favila ME, Halffter V. A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forests and derived ecosystems. Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 84: 131-156, 1992.

Halffter G, Halffter V. Why and where coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) eat seeds, fruits or vegetable detritus. Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 45: 1-22. 2009.

Halffter G, Matthews EG. The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 12/14: 1-312, 1966. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.19690450211

Halftter G. Historical and ecological factors determining the geographical distribution of beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana, 82: 195-238, 1991. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21426/B615110376

Hamel-Leigue AC, Herzog SK, Mann DJ. Composición y riqueza de una comunidad de escarabajos peloteros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) en los Yungas bajos de la Cordillera Mosetenes, Bolivia. Revista Boliviana de Ecología y Conservación Ambiental, 23: 39-49, 2008.

Hernández MIM. Besouros escarabeíneos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) da caatinga paraibana, Brasil. Oecologia Brasiliensis, 11(3): 356–364, 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2007.1103.06

Hernández MIM, Barreto SCS, Costa VH, Creão-Duarte AJ, Favila ME. Response of a dung beetle assemblage along a reforestation gradient in Restinga forest. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18: 539–546, 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9645-5

Janzen DH. Seasonal change in abundance of large nocturnal dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) in a Costa Rican deciduous forest and adjacent horse pasture. Oikos, 41: 274-283, 1983. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/3544274

Jesus RM, Rolim SG. Fitossociologia da Mata Atlântica de Tabuleiro. Boletim Técnico da Sociedade de Investigações Florestais, 19: 1-149, 2005.

Lagomarsino LP, Frost LA. The Central Role of Taxonomy in the Study of Neotropical Biodiversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 105(3): 405-421. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3417/2020601

Larsen TH, Lopera A, Forsyth A. Extreme trophic and habitat specialization by Peruvian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 60: 315-324, 2006. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X(2006)60[315:ETAHSB]2.0.CO;2

Lima JDN, Silva VC, Biachi V, Silva PG, Di Mare RA. Estrutura e organização de assembleias de Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) em diferentes fitofisionomias no sul do Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 105(4): 393-402, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-476620151054393402

Lima MGA, Silva RPA, Sousa MDF, Costa EM. Diversidade de Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) no parque botânico do Ceará, Caucaia - CE, Brasil. Revista Agro@mbiente On-line, 7(1): 89-94, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v7i1.970

Lopes J, Korasaki V, Catelli LL, Marçal VVM, Nunes MPBP. A comparison of dung beetle assemblage structure (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) between an Atlantic forest fragment and adjacent abandoned pasture in Paraná, Brazil. Zoologia, 28(1): 72–79, 2011. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702011000100011

Louzada JNC, Lopes FSA. A comunidade de Scarabaeidae copronecrófagos (Coleoptera) de um fragmento de Mata Atlântica. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 41: 117-121, 1997. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212012000200012

Louzada JNC, Schiffler G, Vaz-de-Mello FZ. 1996. Efeitos do fogo sobre a estrutura da comunidade de Scarabaeidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) na restinga da Ilha de Guriri – ES, p. 161-169. In: Miranda HS, Saito CH, Dias BFS. (orgs.). Impactos de queimadas em áreas de Cerrado e Restinga. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. 187p.

Magurran AE. 2003. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford, 256p.

Martins-dos-Santos V. 2021. ICMBio/RBSooretama - Vale S.A e Iavale assinam termo de reciprocidade.

Meira Neto JAA, Souza AL, Lana JM, Valente GE. Composição florística, espectro biológico e fitofisionomia da vegetação de mussununga nos municípios de Caravelas e Mucuri, Bahia. Árvore, 29(1): 139-150. 2005. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622005000100015.

Mezzonato-Pires AC, Da Silva Ribeiro R, Gonella PM. Maracujá on the rocks: a new Passiflora species (Passifloraceae sensu stricto) from the rupicolous ecosystems of the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Willdenowia, 51(3): 371-381, 2021.

Milhomem MS, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Diniz IR. Técnicas de coleta de besouros copronecrófagos no Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38(11): 1249-1256, 2003. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2003001100001

Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2000. Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a Conservação da Biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica e Campos Sulinos. MMA/SBF, Brasília, 40p.

Nichols E, et al. Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: A quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 137: 1-19, 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023

Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amézquita S, Favila ME. Ecological functions and ecosystems services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation, 141: 1461-1474, 2008. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011

Noriega JA, Realpe E. Altitudinal turnover of species in a Neotropical peripheral mountain system: A case study with dung beetles (Coleoptera: Aphodiinae and Scarabaeinae). Environmental Entomology, 20(10): 1-12, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvy133

Ocampo FC, Philips TK. Food relocation and nesting behavior of the Argentinian dung beetle genus Eucranium and comparison with the southwest African Scarabaeus (Pachysoma) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 64: 53-59, 2005.

Palmeirim AF, Vieira MV, Peres CA. Herpetofaunal responses to anthropogenic forest habitat modification across the neotropics: insights from partitioning β-diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2877-2891, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1394-9

Philips TK. The evolutionary history and diversification of dung beetles, p. 22–46. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ. (Eds.). 2011. Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Przybyszewski KR, et al. Can baited pitfall traps for sampling dung Beetles Replace Conventional Traps for Sampling Ants?. Sociobiology, 67(3): 376-387, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i3.5201

Salomão PR, Iannuzzi L. Dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) assemblage of a highly fragmented landscape of Atlantic forest: from small to the largest fragments of northeastern Brazilian region. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 59: 126-131, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.03.008

Santos JPD, et al. Atlantic butterflies: a data set of fruit feeding butterfly communities from the Atlantic forests. Ecology, 99: 2875, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2507

Schiffler G, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Azevedo CO. Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera) do Delta do Rio Doce e Vale do Suruaca no Município de Linhares, Estado do Espírito Santo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências, 5: 205-211, 2003.

Silva FAB, Vaz-de-Mello F. A revision of the genus Aphengium Harold, 1868 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini). Zootaxa, 3955(4): 505-520, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3955.4.3

Silva PG. Revisiting spatial and temporal patterns of dung beetles in Brazilian Pampa: the role of β-diversity process-related components. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências, 19: 6-24, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.34019/2596-3325.2018.v19.24683

Silva PG, Audino LD, Nogueira JM, Moraes LP, Vaz-de-Mello FZ. Escarabeíneos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) de uma área de campo nativo no bioma Pampa, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 12: 246-253, 2012a. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032012000300024.

Silva PG, Di Mare RA. Escarabeíneos copro-necrófagos (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae) de fragmentos de Mata Atlântica em Silveira Martins, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 102: 197-205, 2012. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212012000200012

Silva PG, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Di Mare RA. Attractiveness of different bait to the Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest fragments in extreme Southern Brazil. Zoological Studies, 51: 429-441, 2012b. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i3.29433

Silva PG, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Di Mare RA. Diversity and seasonality of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest fragments in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 85: 79-697, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652013005000033

Silva RJ, Ribeiro HV, Souza MF, Vaz-de-Mello FZ. Influência da granulometria do solo na estrutura de guildas funcionais de besouros rola-bostas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) em florestas semideciduais no estado do Mato Grosso, Brasil. Bioscience Journal, 31(2): 601-612, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v31n1a2015-23525

Silva RR, et al. ATLANTIC ANTS: a dataset of ants in Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology, 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3580.

Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ. 2011. Reproductive competition and its impact on the evolution and ecology of dung beetles, p. 1-20. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ. (Eds.). Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. 368p.

Spector S, Ayzama S. Rapid turnover and edge effects in dung beetle assemblages (Scarabaeidae) at a Bolivian neotropical forest-savanna. Biotropica, 35: 394-404, 2003. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1646/02102

Srbek-Araujo AC, Chiarello AG. Registro de perdiz Rhynchotus rufescens (Aves, Tinamiformes, Tinamidae) no interior da Reserva Natural Vale, Espírito Santo, Sudeste do Brasi0l. Biota Neotropica, 8: 251-254, 2008. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032008000200023

Storck-Tonon D, Silva RJ, Sawaris L, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Silva DJ, Peres CA. Habitat patch size and isolation drive the near-complete collapse of Amazonian dung beetle assemblages in a 30-year-old forest archipelago. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(7): 2419-2438, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01982-y

Valois MC, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Silva FAB. Taxonomic revision of the Dichotomius sericeus (Harold, 1867) species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa, 4277(4): 503–530, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4277.4.3

Vaz-de-Mello FZ. 2000. Estado atual de conhecimentos dos Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) do Brasil, p.183-195. In: Martín-Piera F, Morrone JJ, Melic A. (Eds.). Hacia un Proyecto CYTED para el Inventario y Estimación de la Diversidad Entomológica en Iberoamérica. Zaragosa, PrIBES-SEA. 236p.

Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Bavutti LLO, Flechtmann CAH, Puker A, Correa CMA. Lista de espécies dos Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 107: 1-6, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2017120

Viegas G, Stenert C, Schulz UH, Maltchik L. Dung beetle communities as biological indicators of riparian forest widths in southern Brazil. Ecological Indicators, 36: 703-710, 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.036

Vieira L, Louzada JNC, Spector S. Effects of degradation and replacement of southern Brazilian coastal sandy vegetation on the dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biotropica, 40: 719-727, 2008. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00432.x

Vieira L, Louzada J, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Lopes PP, Silva FAB. New records, threatens and conservation status for Dichotomius schiffleri Vaz-de-Mello, Louzada & Gavino (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): an endangered dung beetle species from Brazilian Atlantic Forest ecosystems. Neotropical Entomology, 40: 282-284, 2011. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000200020

Vieira L, Silva FAB. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of the Floresta Nacional Contendas do Sincorá, Bahía, Brazil. Check List, 8(4):733-739, 2012. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15560/8.4.733

Vieira L, Silva FAB, Louzada J. Dung beetles in a Caatinga Natural Reserve: a threatened Brazilian dry-forest with high biological value. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 107:1-6, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2017045

Wolda H. Insect seasonality: why? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19: 1-18, 1988. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.000245

Zimbres B, Peres CA, Machado RB. Terrestrial mammal responses to habitat structure and quality of remnant riparian forests in an Amazonian cattle-ranching landscape. Biological Conservation, 206: 283-292. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.033

Downloads

Publicado

23/08/2022

Edição

Seção

Fluxo contínuo

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)