Roça sem fogo: a visão de agricultores e técnicos sobre uma experiência de manejo na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Amanã, Amazonas, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v6i2.526Keywords:
Agroforestry systems, Amazonia, conservation policies, fire use, shifting agricultureAbstract
This essay offers a critical analysis of agroforestry extension work conducted in Central Amazonia (Amazonas State, Brazil) between 2011 and 2013 by the Agricultural Ecosystem Management Program of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute. Agroforestry initiatives were based in agroecological principles to promote sustainable use of forest areas. Central to the initiative was the proposal to establish annual fields without the use of fire—integral to regional shifting agricultural practices. In the context of international climate change policies in developing countries and multiplication of REDD+ projects (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) in the developing world, initiatives to curb the use of fire and to reduce forest clearing are ongoing in Amazonia since 2008. Our case study offers insights from the field on the relationship between proponents of these policies and local populations. We analyze how ribeirinho farmers received and incorporated the proposal to plant without using fire into local practices focusing on the preliminary results of eight experimental areas established in the Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve from 2011 to 2012. Based on field observations, reports, and interviews with farmers we describe the methods used to establish experimental areas, management practices presented to farmers during extension work, and how these techniques differ from local agricultural practices. We reflect upon the lessons that emerged from the encounter between technicians and farmers during training events, and discuss the various ways in which farmers involved themselves in experiments. We conclude that future agroforestry work should better account for these parameters and seek to understand the kinship and social networks through which farmers exchange knowledge and seed materials. Practitioners might better disseminate new practices more effectively through these existing networks. Success of ongoing activities depends on developing proposals that meet farmers' needs and interests. Finally, initiatives should be presented as a complement to, and not substitute for, local shifting agricultural practices.
References
Belcher, B.; Michon, G.; Angelsen, A.; Ruiz Perez, M. & Asbjornsen, H. 2005. The socioeconomic conditions determining the development, persistence, and decline of forest garden systems. Economic Botany, 59(3): 245-253.
Bernard, H.R. 2011. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman Altamira. 680p.
Brookfield, H; Padoch, C. Parsons, H. & Stocking, M. 2002. Cultivating biodiversity: understanding, analysing and using agricultural diversity. Rugby Warwickshire, ITDG Publishing. 304p.
Carmenta, R.; Parry, L.; Blackburn, A.; Vermeylen, S. & Barlow, J. 2011. Understanding human-fire interactions in tropical forest regions: a case for interdisciplinary research across the natural and social sciences. Ecology and Society, 16(1): 53.
Castro, A.P. de; Fraxe, T.J.P.; Santiago, J.L.; Matos, R.B. & Pinto, I.C. 2009. Os sistemas agroflorestais como alternativa de sustentabilidade em ecossistemas de várzea no Amazonas. Acta Amazônica, 39(2): 279-288
Coomes, O.T.; Grimard, F. & Burt, G.J. 2000. Tropical forests and shifting cultivation: secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 32(1): 109-124.
Cunha, M.C.da. 2009. Cultura com aspas e outros ensaios. Cosac Naify. 436p.
Denevan, W.M. & Padoch, C. 1987. Swidden-fallow agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. New York Botanical Garden: Advances in Economic Botany, 107 p.
Dubois, J.-C. 1996. Manual agroflorestal para a Amazônia. REBRAF.
Eloy L. 2008. Dynamiques et adaptation des systèmes agroforestiers périurbains dans le nord-ouest Amazonien. Bois et Forêts des tropiques, 296: 45-55.
Emperaire, L. & Eloy, L. 2014. Amerindian Agriculture in an Urbanising Amazonia (Rio Negro, Brazil). Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34: 70-84.
Erickson, C.L. 2008. Amazonia: the historical ecology of a domesticated landscape. p. 157-183 In: The handbook of South American archaeology. Springer, 1218 p.
Fearnside, P.M. 2005. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conservation biology, 19(3): 680-688.
Fearnside, P.M. 2009. Degradação dos recursos naturais na Amazônia Brasileira: implicações para o uso de sistemas agroflorestais. p. 161-170 In: R. Porro (ed.) Alternativa agroflorestal na Amazônia em Transformação. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) & EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, Belém, 825 p.
Harris, M. 2006. Presente ambivalente: uma maneira amazônica de estar no tempo. p. 81-108 In: Adams, C.; Murrieta, R.; Neves, W. Sociedades caboclas amazônicas: modernidade e invisibilidade. São Paulo: Annablume, 369 p.
Hecht, S.B. & Cockburn, A. 2010. The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. University of Chicago Press, 408 p.
Irion, G.; Mello, J.A.S.N.de; Morais, J.; Piedade, M.T.F.; Junk, W.J. & Garming, L. 2011. Development of the Amazon valley during the Middle to Late Quaternary: sedimentological and climatological observations. p. 27-42 In: Amazonian floodplain forests. Springer. 618p.
Júnior, S.B.; Maneschy, R.Q.; Júnior, M.M.; Gazel-Filho, A.B.; Yared, J.A.G.; Gonçalves, D. & Gama, M.B. 2010. Sistemas agroflorestais na Amazônia brasileira: análise de 25 anos de pesquisas. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, 60: 67-76.
Leeuwen, J.Van; Clement, C.R. & Gomes, J.B.M. 2002. Desenvolvimento e avaliação participativa de sistemas agroflorestais. p. 88-93 In: Livro de resultados dos projetos de pesquisa dirigida (PPDs)-PPG7. MCT.
Lima, D. 1992. The social category caboclo: history, social organization, identity and outsider's social classification of the rural population of an amazonian region (the Middle Solimões), University of Cambridge.
Lima, D. 2004. The Roça Legacy: land use and kinship dynamics in Nogueira, an Amazonian community of the middle Solimões region. Some other Amazonians: perspectives on modern Amazonia. Londres: University of London, Institute of Latin American Studies, 12-36.
Lima, D.; Steward, A. & Richers, B.T. 2012. Trocas, experimentações e preferências: um estudo sobre a dinâmica da diversidade da mandioca no Médio Solimões, Amazonas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emılio Goeldi, 371-396.
Miller, R.P. & Nair, P.K.R. 2006. Indigenous agroforestry systems in Amazonia: from prehistory to today. Agroforestry systems, 66(2): 151-164.
Miller, R.P.; Penn JR,J.W. & Leeuwen, J.Van. 2006. Amazonian homegardens: their ethnohistory and potential contribution to agroforestry development. In: Tropical homegardens. Springer, 43-60.
Nair, P.K.R. An introduction to agroforestry. Springer Science & Business Media, 1993.
Padoch, C. & Jong, W.de. 1991. The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Economic Botany, 45(2): 166-175.
Padoch, C. & Pinedo-Vasquez, M. 2010. Saving Slash-and-Burn to Save Biodiversity. Biotropica, 42(5): 550-552.
Pedroso Junior, N.N.; Murrieta, R.S.S. & Adams, C. 2008. A agricultura de corte e queima: um sistema em transformação. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 3(2): 153-174.
Pollini, J. 2009. Agroforestry and the search for alternatives to slash-and-burn cultivation: From technological optimism to a political economy of deforestation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(1-2): 48-60.
Posey, D.A. 1985. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 3(2): 139-158. Programa de Manejo de Agroecossistemas. 2011.
Planejamento Estratégico 2011-2015. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Tefé.
Ribeiro Filho, A.A.; Adams, C. & Murrieta, R.S.S. 2013. The impacts of shifting cultivation on tropical forest soil: a review. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, v. 8, n. 3, p. 693-727.
Richers, B.T.T. 2010. Agricultura migratória em ambientes de várzea na Amazônia central: ameaça ou sistema integrado? Uakari, 6 (1): 27-37.
Rognant, C. & Steward, A. 2014. Sítios of Lake Amanã: Land use change and the evolution of smallscale livelihood strategies in the Middle Solimões region, Amazonia, ICREA Conference on Small-Scale Societies and Environmental Transformations: co-evolutionary Dynamics, 17-18.
Schmidt, M.J. 2003. Farming and patterns of agrobiodiversity on the Amazon floodplain in the vicinity of Mamirauá, Amazonas, Brazil. Tese de doutorado, University of Florida. 199p.
Steward, A. no prelo. Fire use among swidden farmers in Central Amazonia: Reflections on practice and conservation policies. In Fowler, C. (ed.). Fire ecology and Environmental Change, University of Utah Press.
Vliet, N.van; Mertz, O.; Heinimann, A.; Langanke, T.; Pascual, U.; Schmook, B.; Adams, A.; SchmidtVogt, D.; Messerli, P.; Leisz, S.; Castella, J.C.; Jørgensen, L; Birch-Thomsen, T.; Hett, C.; Bech-Bruun, T.; Ickowitz, A.; Vu, K.C.; Yasuyuli, K.; Fox, J.; Padoch, C.; dressler, W. & Ziegler, A.D. 2012. Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: a global assessment. Global Environmental Change, 22(2): 418-429.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Biodiversidade Brasileira - BioBrasil
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.