Dinámica reproductiva y tendencia poblacional en la mayor colonia del piquero Patirrojo Sula sula (Linnaeus, 1766) en el Atlántico Sur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v14i3.2539Palabras clave:
Reproducción estacional, archipíelago de Fernando de Noronha, aves marinas, región tropicalResumen
La comprensión de los parámetros reproductivos basados en estudios estandarizados es un excelente indicador para evaluar los cambios a largo plazo y para evaluar las tendencias poblacionales, especialmente en especies estacionales. En este estudio, monitoreamos mensualmente grandes colonias independientes del Piquero Patirrojo Sula sula (Linnaeus, 1766) durante 2018-2024 en el archipiélago de Fernando de Noronha, con un enfoque en el reconocimiento de la dinámica reproductiva y las tendencias poblacionales. Se observaron colonias sincronizadas, siguiendo patrones estacionales claros, durante seis temporadas reproductivas bien definidas (con una duración media de 15 meses). Se registraron adultos reproductivos en todos los meses del año, con picos de nidos activos en agosto (34,75 ± 8,80 nidos/ha) y abundancia total de individuos en junio (50,84 ± 11,46 individuos/ha). El número de nidos activos y de adultos reproductivos se mantuvo estable a lo largo del periodo de estudio. La abundancia de adultos en las colonias aumentó en respuesta al incremento de individuos no nidificantes, lo que apunta a un reclutamiento de la población. Esto lo corrobora el aumento del éxito reproductivo a lo largo de las estaciones reproductivas, el cual varió notablemente (c. 8-40%). Nuestros datos proporcionaron el primer censo continuo a lo largo de los años para el Piquero Patirrojo. Destacamos que un monitoreo continuado a largo plazo es crucial para comprender la dinámica poblacional de las mayores colonias de esta ave marina en la región del Atlántico Sur.
Citas
Hutchinson AE. Estimating numbers of colonial nesting seabirds: a comparison of techniques. Prod. Colonial Waterbirds. 1979; 3: 235-244.
Bibby C, Jones M, Marsden S. Expedition field techniques: bird surveys. London: Royal Geographical Society. 1998.
Johnson CM, Krohn WB. The importance of survey timing in monitoring breeding seabird numbers. Waterbirds. 2001; 22-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1522239
Graham NA, Wilson SK, Carr P, Hoey AS, Jennings S, Macneil MA. Seabirds enhance coral reef productivity and functioning in the absence of invasive rats. Nature. 2018; 559(7713): 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0202-3
Hentati-Sundberg J, Raymond C, Sköld M, Svensson O, Gustafsson B, Bonaglia S. Fueling of a marine-terrestrial ecosystem by a major seabird colony. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72238-6
Grémillet D, Boulinier T. Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review. Mar. Ecol. Prog. 2009; 391: 121-137. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08212
Croxall JP, Butchart SH, Lascelles B, Stattersfield AJ, Sullivan B, Symes A, Taylor P. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conserv. Int. 2012; 22(1): 1-34. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270912000020
Ronconi RA, Lascelles BG, Langham GM, Reid JB, Oro D. The role of seabirds in Marine Protected Area identification, delineation, and monitoring: introduction and synthesis. Biol. Conserv. 2012; 156: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.016
Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Cazelles B, Weimerskirch H. Modelling population dynamics of seabirds: importance of the effects of climate fluctuations on breeding proportions. Oikos. 2005; 108(3): 511-522. https://doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13351.x
Chambers LE, Dann P, Cannell B, Woehler EJ. Climate as a driver of phenological change in southern seabirds. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2014; 58: 603-612. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0711-6
Ponchon A, Grémillet D, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Erikstad KE, Barrett RT, Reiertsen TK, McCoy KD, Tveraa T, Boulinier T. When things go wrong: intra-season dynamics of breeding failure in a seabird. Ecosphere. 2014; 5(1): 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00233.1
Carr P, Votier S, Koldewey H, Godley B, Wood H, Nicoll MAC. Status and phenology of breeding seabirds and a review of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the British Indian Ocean Territory. Bird Conserv. Int. 2021; 31(1): 14-34. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270920000295
Nunes GT, Efe MA, Serafini PP, Bugoni L. Aves marinhas no Brasil: desafios para a conservação. Oecol. Aust. 2023; 7(3): 254-269. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2023.2703.01
MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Portaria n. 300, de 13 de dezembro de 2022 (Brasil). Reconhece a Lista Nacional de Espécies Ameaçadas de Extinção. Diário Oficial da União. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-gm/mma-n-300-de-13-de-dezembro-de-2022-450425464
Howell SNG, Zufelt K. Oceanic birds of the world: a photo guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2019.
Schreiber EA, Schreiber RW, Schenk GA. Red-footed Booby (Sula sula). In: Billerman SM. Birds of the World. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.refboo.01
Nelson JB. The Sulidae: gannets and boobies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978.
Carboneras C. Family Sulidae (Gannets and Boobies). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions; 1992; 312-325.
Lormee H, Barbraud C, Chastel O. Reversed sexual size dimorphism and parental care in the Redâ€footed Booby Sula sula. Ibis. 2005; 147(2): 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00404.x
Carboneras C, Christie DA, Jutglar F, Garcia EFJ, Kirwan GM. Red-footed Booby (Sula sula). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Vicens JS, Christie DA. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. 2018.
Mendez L, Borsa P, Cruz S, Grissac S, Hennicke J, Lallemand J, Prudor A, Weimerskirch H. Geographical variation in the foraging behaviour of the pantropical red-footed booby. Mar. Ecol. Prog. 2017; 568: 217-230. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12052
Pacheco JF, Silveira LF, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Bencke GA, Bravo GA, Brito GRR, Cohn-Haft M, Maurício GN, Naka LN, Olmos F, Posso SR, Lees AC, Figueiredo LFA, Carrano E, Guedes RC, Cesari E, Franz I, Schunck F, Piacentini VQ. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee - second edition. Ornithol. Res. 2021; 29: 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x
Hartog JC. A record of a red-footed Booby Sula sula (L.) from the Cape Verde Islands, with a review of the status of this species in the South Atlantic. Ocean. Zool. Meded. 1987; 61(28): 405-419.
Simmons KEL. The status of the Red-footed Booby Sula sula at Ascension Island. Bull. Br. Orn. Club. 1990; 110: 210-222.
Ratcliffe N, Bell M, Pelembe T, Boyle D, Benjamin R, White R, Godley B, Stevenson J, Sanders S. The eradication of feral cats from Ascension Island and its subsequent recolonization by seabirds. Oryx. 2010; 44(1): 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060530999069X
Beard A, Lambdon P. First recorded breeding attempt of Red-footed Booby Sula sula on St Helena Island, South Atlantic. Seabird. 2016; 29: 15-21. http://doi.org/10.61350/sbj.29.15
Mancini PL, Serafini PP, Bugoni L. Breeding seabird populations in Brazilian oceanic islands: historical review, update and a call for census standardization. Rev. Bras. Ornit. 2016; 24: 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544338
Port D, Fisch F. Atobá-de-pé-vermelho Sula sula (Linnaeus, 1766) (Suliformes: Sulidae) na Ilha da Trindade após 13 anos do último registro. Ornithologia. 2020; 11(1): 27-29.
Rocha WJS. Características hidrogeológicas e hidroquímicas da Ilha de Fernando de Noronha [tese]. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 1995. 382 f.
Teixeira W, Cordani UG, Menor EA, Teixeira MG, Lisker R. Arquipélago Fernando de Noronha: o paraíso do vulcão. São Paulo: Terra Virgem Editora; 2003.
Renner S. Plant dispersal across the tropical Atlantic by wind and sea currents. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 2004; 165: 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1086/383334
Batistella M. Espécies vegetais dominantes do Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha: grupos ecológicos e repartição espacial. Acta bot. bras. 1996; 10(2): 223-235.
Freitas AMM. A flora fanerogâmica atual do arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha - Brasil [tese]. Feira de Santana: Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. 2007.
Silva e Silva R. Aves de Fernando de Noronha. Vinhedo: Avis Brasilis; 2008.
Matheus Z, Francini-Filho RB, Pereira-Filho GH, Moraes FC, Moura RL, Brasileiro PS, Amado-Filho GM. Benthic reef assemblages of the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, tropical South-west Atlantic: effects of depth, wave exposure and cross-shelf positioning. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0210664. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210664
Devenish C, Díaz-Fernandez DF, Clay RP, Davidson I, Zabala Y. Important Bird Areas Americas: priority sites for biodiversity conservation. Quito: BirdLife International; 2009.
Whittaker A, Silva JPF, Lucio B, Kirwan GM. Old World vagrants on Fernando de Noronha, including two additions to the Brazilian avifauna, and predictions for potential future Palearctic vagrants. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club. 2019; 139(3): 189-204. https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v139i3.2019.a2
MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Plano de Manejo da Área de Proteção Ambiental de Fernando de Noronha - Rocas - São Pedro e São Paulo. Brasília: ICMBio/MMA; 2017.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cidades e Estados: Fernando de Noronha [acesso em 20 jan 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades‑e‑estados/pe/fernando‑de‑noronha.html/
IBAMA - Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais. Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha. Fernando de Noronha: IBAMA/FUNATURA; 1990.
ICMBio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Estratégia integrada de monitoramento marinho costeiro: Programa Nacional de Monitoramento da Biodiversidade do ICMBio (MONITORA) - Subprograma Marinho e Costeiro. Brasília: ICMBio/MMA; 2019.
Perrins CM, Birkhead TR. Avian ecology. Glasgow: Blackie; 1983.
Dorward DF. Comparative biology of the white and brown booby Sula spp. of Ascension. Ibis. 1962; 103b: 174-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1962.tb07244.x
Branco JO, Fracasso HAA, Moraes-Ornellas VS. Reproduction and demographic trends of Sula leucogaster at the Moleques do Sul Archipelago, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2013; 13(4): 39-45. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032013000400004
Priddel D, hutton I, Olson S, Wheeler R. Breeding biology of masked boobies (Sula dactylatra tasmani) on Lord Howe Island, Australia. Emu. 2005; 105(2): 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU04028
Bolton M, Watt REF, Henry L, Clingham E. Re-colonisation and successful breeding of Masked Boobies Sula dactylatra on mainland St Helena, South Atlantic, in the presence of Feral Cats Felis catus. Seabird. 2011; 24: 60-71. http://doi.org/10.61350/sbj.24.60
Cubaynes S, Doherty PF, Schreiber EA, Gimenez O. To breed or not to breed: A seabird's response to extreme climatic events. Biol. Lett. 2011; 7: 303-306. http://doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0778
Verner J. Nesting activities of the Red-footed Booby in British Honduras. Auk. 1961; 78: 573-594. https://doi.org/10.2307/4082191
Diamond AW. The red-footed booby on Aldabra Atoll, Indian ocean. Ardea. 1974; 62: 196-218.
Nelson JB. The breeding ecology of the red-footed booby in the Galapagos. J. Anim. Ecol. 1969; 38: 181-198.
Le Corre M. Breeding seasons of seabirds at Europa Island (southern Mozambique Channel) in relation to seasonal changes in the marine environment. J. Zoo. 2001; 254(2): 239-249. http://doi:10.1017/s0952836901000759
Harris MP. Breeding seasons of sea-birds in the Galapagos Islands. J. Zool. 1969; 159(2): 145-165. http://doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1969.tb03076.x
Schreiber RW, Ashmole NP. Sea-bird breeding seasons on Christmas Island, Pacific Ocean. Ibis. 1970; 112(3): 363-394. https://doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1970.tb00113.x
Harris MP, Halley DJ, Wanless S. Philopatryinthe Common Guillemot Uria aalge. Bird Stud. 1996; 43: 134-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659609461005
Dearborn DC, Anders AD, Schreiber EA, Adams RM, Mueller UG. Interâ€island movements and population differentiation in a pelagic seabird. Mol. Ecol. 2003; 12(10): 2835-2843. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01931.x
Morris-Pocock JA, Steeves TE, Estela FA, Anderson DJ, Friesen VL. Comparative phylogeography of brown (Sula leucogaster) and red-footed boobies (S. sula): the influence of physical barriers and habitat preference on gene flow in pelagic seabirds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010; 54(3): 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.11.013
Morris-Pocock JA, Anderson DJ, Friesen VL. Biogeographical barriers to dispersal and rare gene flow shape population genetic structure in red-footed boobies Sula sula. J. Biogeogr. 2016; 43(11): 2125-2135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12780
Schreiber EA, Lee DS. Status and Conservation of West Indian Seabirds. Ruston: Society of Caribbean Ornithology; 2000.
BirdLife International. Sula sula. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [acesso em 30 jan 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22696694/168988714
Dearborn DC, Anders AD, Flint EN. Trends in reproductive success of Hawaiian seabirds: is guild membership a good criterion for choosing indicator species? Biol. Conserv. 2001; 101(1): 0-103. http://doi: 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00030-1
Cao L, Pang YL, Liu NF. Status of the red-footed booby on the Xisha Archipelago, South China Sea. Waterbirds. 2005; 28(4): 411-419. http://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2005)28[411:SOTRBO]2.0.CO;2
Russell TA, Vanderwerf EA. Red-footed Booby Sula sula breeding success at Ulupa'u Crater, Marine Corps Base, Hawaii. Mar. Ornithol. 2010; 38: 129-131.
Erikstad KE, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Steen H. On the cost of reproduction in long-lived birds: the influence of environmental variability. Ecology. 1998; 79: 1781-1788. http://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1781:OTCORI]2.0.CO;2
Keogan K, Daunt F, Wanless S, Phillips RA, Walling CA, Agnew P, Ainley DG, Anker-Nilssen T, Ballard G, Barrett RT, Barton KJ, Bech C, Becker P, Berglund P-A, Bollache L, Bond AL, Bouwhuis S, Bradley RW, Burr ZM, Camphuysen K, Catry P, Chiaradia A, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Cuthbert R, Dehnhard N, Descamps S, Diamond T, Divoky G, Drummond H, Dugger KM, Dunn MJ, Emmerson L, Erikstad KE, Fort J, Fraser W, Genovart M, Gilg O, González-Solís J, Granadeiro JP, Grémillet D, Hansen J, Hanssen SA, Harris M, Hedd A, Hinke J, Igual JM, Jahncke J, Jones I, Kappes PJ, Lang J, Langset M, Lescroël A, Lorentsen S-H, Lyver POB, Mallory M, Moe B, Montevecchi WA, Monticelli D, Mostello C, Newell M, Nicholson L, Nisbet I, Olsson O, Oro D, Pattison V, Poisbleau M, Pyk T, Quintana F, Ramos JA, Ramos R, Reiertsen TK, Rodríguez C, Ryan P, Sanz-Aguilar A, Schmidt NM, Shannon P, Sittler B, Southwell C, Surman C, Svagelj WS, Trivelpiece W, Warzybok P, Watanuki Y, Weimerskirch H, Wilson PR, Wood AG, Phillimore AB, Lewis S. Global phenological insensitivity to shifting ocean temperatures among seabirds. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018; 8(4): 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0115-z
Wanless S, Frederiksen M, Walton J, Harris MP. Long term changes in breeding phenology at two seabird colonies in the western North Sea. Ibis. 2009; 151(2): 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00906.x
Oren DC. Resultados de uma nova Expedição Zoológica a Fernando de Noronha. Bol. Mus. Paraense "Emilio Goeldi". 1984; 1: 19-44.
Barbosa-Filho RC, Sousa AEBA, Freitas GL, Nunes MFC, Souza EA, Zeppelini-Filho D. A Garça-vaqueira (Bubulcus ibis Linnaeus, 1758) e o Atobá-de-pé-vermelho (Sula sula Linnaeus, 1766) no Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha: uma abordagem ecológica comparativa. Ornithologia. 2009; 3: 101-114.
Russell JC. Indirect effects of introduced predators on seabird islands. In: Seabird islands: ecology, invasion, and restoration. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011; 261-279.
ICMBio - Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha [acesso em 20 jan 2023]. Disponível em: http://www.parnanoronha.com.br/
Burger J, Gochfeld M. Tourism and short-term behavioral responses of nesting masked, red-footed, and blue-footed, boobies in the Galápagos. Environ. Conserv. 1993; 20(3): 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900023043
Cajiao D, Izurieta JC, Casafont M, Reck G, Castro K, Santamaría V, Cárdenas S, Leung YF. Tourist use and impact monitoring in the Galapagos: An evolving programme with lessons learned. Parks. 2020; 26: 89-102.
Alves VS, Soares ABA, Couto GS, Ribeiro ABB, Efe MA. Aves do Arquipélago dos Abrolhos, Bahia, Brasil. Ararajuba. 1997; 5: 209-218.
Both R, Freitas TOR. Aves marinhas no Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo. In: Branco JO. Aves marinhas e insulares brasileiras, bioecologia e conservação. Itajaí: Univali Editora. 2004; 193-212.
Barbosa-Filho R, Vooren CM. Abundância, estrutura etária e razão sexual do Atobá-marrom Sula leucogaster (Pelecaniformes: Sulidae) no Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Ornit. 2010; 18: 157-163.
Surman CA, Nicholson LW, Santora JA. Effects of climate variability on breeding phenology and performance of tropical seabirds in the eastern Indian Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012; 454: 147-157. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09729
Esparza I, Elliott KH, Gallardo OG, Guzman HM. Upwelling links reproductive success and phenology in tropical Brown Boobies Sula leucogaster. Mar Ornithol. 2022; 50(2): 119-124.
Braga EDS, Chiozzini VG, Berbel GBB. Oligotrophic water conditions associated with organic matter regeneration support life and indicate pollution on the western side of Fernando de Noronha Island-NE, Brazil (3 S). Braz. J. Oceanogr. 2018; 66: 73-90. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592018148306601
Campelo RP, Bonou, FK, Melo Junior M, Diaz XFG, Bezerra LEA, Neumann-Leitão S. Zooplankton biomass around marine protected islands in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J. Sea. Res. 2019; 154: 101810. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2019.101810
Roy A, Delord K, Nunes GT, Barbraud C, Bugoni L, Lanco-Bertrand S. Did the animal move? A cross-wavelet approach to geolocation data reveals year-round whereabouts of a resident seabird. Mar. Biol. 2021; 168(7): 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03923-x
Mancini PL, Hobson KA, Bugoni L. Role of body size in shaping the trophic structure of tropical seabird communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. 2014; 497(2014): 243-257. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10589
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais de seus artigos sem restrições, concedendo ao editor direitos de ção não exclusivos.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Os artigos estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O acesso é livre e gratuito para download e leitura, ou seja, é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer mídia ou formato.
