Importância dos Estudos Etnobotânicos em Áreas Protegidas: um Estudo de Caso no Brasil

Authors

  • Wanderley Silveira Junior Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil.
  • Mariane da Fonseca Melo Center for Environmental Sciences, Federal Institute of Southeast Minas-Gerais, Barbacena, Cx. P. 992, Barbacena, 36205-018, MG 37200-000, Brazil.
  • Cléber Rodrigo de Souza Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4122-2748
  • Ravi Fernandes Mariano Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil.
  • Renata Vichi Yaguinuma Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-5212
  • Fernanda Magriotis Bellot Noronha Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-2652
  • Marco Aurélio Forest Sciences Department, Federal University of Lavras, Cx. P. 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-4667

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v12i2.1910

Keywords:

Conservação da biodiversidade, conhecimento ecológico tradicional

Abstract

Estudos etnobotânicos no Brasil indicam uma forte relação entre comunidades locais detentoras de conhecimento ecológico tradicional e as plantas utilizadas. As áreas protegidas (AP) brasileiras podem funcionar como refúgios para essas populações, através do fornecimento de produtos florestais não-madeireiros de subsistência. Nosso objetivo foi explorar o estado atual das pesquisas etnobotânicas nas APs brasileiras para explorar seu escopo geográfico (regiões e biomas), as populações envolvidas e a ocorrência em diferentes categorias de AP. Para isso, realizamos um levantamento dos estudos publicados entre 2006 e 2019, totalizando 67 estudos. A Mata Atlântica é o bioma mais estudado, e a região nordeste é a principal região estudada. As populações tradicionais mais pesquisadas são agricultores artesanais e comunidades rurais. As APs de uso sustentável contêm a maioria dos estudos, mas a categoria Parque foi a mais pesquisada. O conhecimento sobre uso de plantas medicinais é o principal tema pesquisado nos estudos. 

References

Abreu DBO, Santoro FR, Albuquerque UP, Ladio AH & Medeiros PM. Medicinal plant knowledge in a context of cultural pluralism: A case study in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 175: 124-130, 2015.

Agra MDF, Baracho GS, Nurit K, Basílio IJLD & Coelho VPM. Medicinal and poisonous diversity of the flora of “Cariri Paraibano”, Brazil. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 111(2): 383-395, 2007.

Albuquerque UP. 2005. Introdução à Etnobotânica. Editora Interciência, Rio de Janeiro, 80 p.

Albuquerque UP. Quantitative ethnobotany or quantification in ethnobotany? Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 7: 1-7, 2009.

Albuquerque UP, Silva JS, Campos JLA, Souza RS, Silva TC & Alves RRN. O status atual da pesquisa etnobiológica na América Latina: lacunas e perspectivas. Journal Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine, 9(72), 2013.

Albuquerque UP et al. Humans as niche constructors: Revisiting the concept of chronic anthropogenic disturbances in ecology. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(1): 1-11, 2018.

Albuquerque UP et al. Ten important questions/issues for ethnobotanical research. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 33(2): 376-385, 2019.

Alves RRN et al. Game mammals of the Caatinga biome. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 5(5), 2016.

Andrade WM, Ramos MA, Souto WMS, Bento-Silva JS, Albuquerque UP & Lima EA. Knowledge, uses and practices of the licuri palm (Syagrus coronata (Mart.) Becc.) around protected areas in northeastern Brazil holding the endangered species Lear's Macaw (Anodorhynchus leari). Tropical Conservation Science, 8(4): 893-911, 2015.

Anderson E & Mammides C. The role of protected areas in mitigating human impact in the world’s last wilderness areas. Ambio, 49(2): 34-441, 2020.

Araújo FR, González-Pérez SE, Lopes MA & Viégas IDJM. Ethnobotany of babassu palm (Attalea speciosa Mart.) in the Tucuruí Lake Protected Areas Mosaic-eastern Amazon. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 30(2): 193-204, 2016.

Berkes F. Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37(4): 489-500, 2010.

Berkes F, Colding J & Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological applications 10(5): 1251-1262, 2000.

Berkes F & Folke C. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 459p.

Brasil. 2000. Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000 - Regulates the article 225, § 1º, items I, II, III e 451 VII from federal Constitution, found the National System of Nature Conservation Units and gives other measures. < https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9985.htm>. Acesso em: 19/02/2020.

Brito MRD & Senna-Valle LD. Diversity of plant knowledge in a" Caiçara" community from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest coast. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 26(4): 735-747, 2012.

Brockington D. Community Conservation, Inequality and Injustice: Myths of Power in Protected Areas Management. Conservation & Society, 2 (2): 411-432, 2004.

Brondo K & Bown N. Neoliberal conservation, garifuna territorial rights and resource management in the Cayos Cochinos marine protected area. Conservation and Society, 9 (2): 91-105, 2011.

CBD Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. <https://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/sbf_dpg/_arquivos/cbding.pdf> Acesso em: 01/02/2020.

Chape S, Spalding M & Jenkins M. 2008. The World’s Protected Areas: Status, Values and Prospects in the 21st Century. University of California Press. 359 p.

CNUC/MMA Cadastro Nacional das unidades de Conservação- Ministério do meio Ambiente. 2019. Unidades de Conservação por bioma. <https://www.mma.gov.br/images/arquivo/80229/CNUC_JUL19%20-%20C_Bio.pdf>.

Acesso em: 10/12/2019.

CNUC/MMA, 2019. Cadastro Nacional das unidades de Conservação- Ministério do meio Ambiente. Categorias. <https://www.mma.gov.br/images/arquivo/80229/CNUC_JUL19%20-%20B_Cat.pdf>. Acesso em: 10/12/2019.

Dudley N. Editor. 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN Gland, Switzerland. 143 p.

Ericson JA. A participatory approach to conservation in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Campeche, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning 74: 242-266, 2006.

Françoso RD, Brandão R, Nogueira CC, Salmona YB, Machado RB & Colli, GR. Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Natureza & Conservação 13: 35 – 40, 2015.

Ghimire S, Mckey D & Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y. Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the himalayas of Nepal: implications for conservation. Ecology and Society 9 (3): 6, 2004.

Hamilton A, Cunningham A, Byarugaba D & Kayanja F. Conservation in a region of political instability: Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 14 (6): 1722–1725, 2000.

Hanazaki N, Tamashiro JY, Leitão-Filho HF & Begossi A. Diversity of plant uses in two caiçara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodiversity & Conservation 9 (5): 597-615, 2000.

Hanazaki N, Zank S, Pinto MC, Kumagai L, Cavechia LA & Peroni N. Etnobotânica nos Areais da Ribanceira de Imbituba: Compreendendo a biodiversidade vegetal manejada para subsidiar a criação de uma reserva de desenvolvimento sustentável. Biodivers Bras, 2: 50-64, 2012.

Higgins-Zogib L, Dudley N & Kothari A. 2010. Living traditions: Protected areas and cultural diversity. in Arguments for protected areas: multiple benefits for conservation and use (S. Stolton S & N. Dudley, eds). Earthscan Routledg, p. 165-180.

Hirota MM et al. 2018. Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlântica. Relatório Técnico, Período 2017-2018. <https://www.sosma.org.br/wp515 content/uploads/2019/05/Atlas-mata-atlantica_17-18.pdf>. Acesso em: 01/12/2019.

IBGE Instituto Brasileiro de geografia e estatística. 2015. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios (PNAD). < https:// educa.ibge.gov.br/jovens/conheça-o519 brasil/poplacao/18313-populacao-rural-e-urbana.html>. Acesso em: 01/12/2019.

IBGE Instituto Brasileiro de geografia e estatística. 2019. Plataforma Geográfica Informativa - Biomas e sistema marinho-costeiro. < https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/biomas/>. Acesso em: 29/04/2020.

ICMBio Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. 2020. Listagem de Unidades de Conservação por Biomas. <https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/unidadesdeconservacao/biomas-brasileiros>. Acesso em: 29/04/2020.

Lele S, Wilshusen P, Brockington D, Seidler R & Bawa K. Beyond exclusion: Alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2 (1): 94-100, 2010.

Mittermeier RA et al. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100: 10309-10313, 2003.

Myers N, Mittermier RA & Mittermier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858, 2000.

Ormsby AA & Bhagwat SA. Sacred forest of India: a strong traditional of community541 based natural resource management. Environmental Conservation 37 (3): 320-326, 2010.

Pellizzaro PC, Hardt LPA, Hardt C, Hardt M & Sehli DA. Gestão e manejo de áreas naturais protegidas: contexto internacional. Ambiente & Sociedade 18(1): 21-40, 2015.

Poderoso RA, Hanazaki N & Dunaiski-Junior A. "How is local knowledge about plants distributed among residents near a protected area?" Ethnobiology and Conservation 1(8), 2012.

Posey DA. 2002. Kayapó ethnoecology and culture. Routledge, London and New York. 304 p.

Rocha TT, Tavares-Martins ACC & Lucas FCA. Traditional populations in environmentally protected areas: an ethnobotanical study in the Soure Marine Extractive Reserve of Brazil. Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas 16: 410-427, 2017.

Rodrigues E et al. Participatory ethnobotany and conservation: a methodological case study conducted with quilombola communities in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 16(2), 2020.

Silveira-Junior WJ, Souza CR, Oliveira J EZ, Moura AS & Fontes MAL. Conflitos entre usos e proteção de espécies vegetais nas Unidades de Conservação da Serra de São José, Minas Gerais. Geo UERJ, 37, 2020.

Silveira-Junior WJ, Souza CR, Mariano RF, Moura CCS, Rodrigues CC & Fontes MAL. Conservation conflicts and their drivers in different protected area management groups: a case study in Brazil. Biodivers Conserv on line, 2021.

Sousa RS, Hanazaki N, Lopes JB & Barros RFM. Are Gender and Age Important in 568 Understanding the Distribution of Local Botanical Knowledge in Fishing Communities of the Parnaiba Delta Environmental Protection Area? Ethnobotany Research and Applications 10: 551-559, 2012.

Souza-Júnior JR, Albuquerque UP & Peroni N. Traditional knowledge and management of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. (pequi) in the brazilian savanna, northeastern brazil. Economic Botany, 67(3): 225-233, 2013.

Trivedi PC. 2006. Medicinal plants: traditional knowledge. International Publishing House, London. 258p.

Torri M. Conservation, relocation and the social consequences of conservation policies in protected areas: case study of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Conservation and Society, 9(1): 54-64, 2011.

Vedeld P, Jumane A, Wapalila G & Songorwa A. Protected areas, poverty and conflicts. A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 21: 20-31, 2012.

Zank S & Hanazaki N. Exploring the Links between Ethnobotany, Local Therapeutic Practices, and Protected Areas in Santa Catarina Coastline, Brazil. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012.

Wild R & Mcleod C. 2008. Sacred Natural Sites: Guidelines for Protected Area Managers. IUCN Gland, Switzerland. 131p.

Published

21/02/2022

Issue

Section

Fluxo contínuo

Most read articles by the same author(s)