Distribution of Threatened Bird Species in the State of Paraná, Southern Brazil, Based on Citizen Science

Authors

  • Marcella Rosa Rossoni de Paula Colégio Estadual Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, Brasil
  • Carlos Alberto Mucelin Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Brasil
  • Vagner Cavarzere Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37002/biobrasil.v12i2.1884

Keywords:

Threat categories, species lists, WikiAves

Abstract

The state of Paraná in southern Brazil has 766 bird species, of which 126 are threatened. Because threatened birds (and their distributions) are an important tool for informing conservation decision-makers, we evaluated information on a citizen science website that provided the number of species by municipality. Citizen scientists posted 4,598 records of 96 threatened species in 126 municipalities, of which 15 are Critically Endangered, 34 are Endangered, and 47 are Vulnerable at the state level. Atlantic Forest endemic species comprise 30% of the bird assemblage, but account for 46% of all records, which suggests that users search for these species non-randomly, favoring threatened species. Species distributions are associated with the remaining vegetation, and human population in each municipality. Most species were found in coastal municipalities, where the Serra do Mar Mountain range, and large urban centers, come together. The number of records of a given species is independent of the number of municipalities in which it is reported. Citizen science greatly contributes to improve our knowledge of threatened species' distributions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ballard HL, Phillips TB, Robinson L. 2018. Conservation outcomes of citizen science, p. 254-268. In: Hecker S, Haklay M, Bowser A, Makuch Z, Vogel J, Bonn A (orgs.). Citizen Science - Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press. 542p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.25

Bíl M, Heigl F, Janoška Z, Vercayie D, Perkins SE. Benefits and challenges of collaborating with volunteers: Examples from National Wildlife Roadkill Reporting Systems in Europe. Journal for Nature Conservation, 54: 125798, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125798

Chrostowski T. Z kolonii polskich w Paranie, I. Ziemia, 2(49/50): 802-805, 1911.

Degroote LW, Hingst‐Zaher E, Lima LM, Whitacre J, Slyder JB, Wenzel JW. Citizen science data reveals the cryptic migration of the Common Potoo Nyctibius griseus in Brazil. Ibis, 163(2): 380-389, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12904

Devictor V, Whittaker RJ, Beltrame C. Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions, 16(3): 354-362, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.x

Farias M, Roper J, Cavarzere V. Bird communities and their conservation priorities are better understood through the integration of traditional and citizen science data: an example from brazilian Atlantic Forest. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 1-13, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.349

Fritzsons E, Mantovani LE, Wrege MS, Neto AC. Análise da pluviometria para definição de zonas homogêneas no Estado do Paraná. RA'E GA - O Espaço Geográfico em Análise, 23: 555-572, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/raega.v23i0.24921

Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG. 2003. The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook (vol. 1). Island Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/G311910541

Henckel L, Bradter U, Jönsson M, Isaac NJB, Snäll T. Assessing the usefulness of citizen science data for habitat suitability modelling: Opportunistic reporting versus sampling based on a systematic protocol. Diversity and Distributions, 26(10): 1276-1290, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13128

ICMBio/MMA. 2018. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Volume III - Aves. 1 ed. 709p.

Instituto Agronômico do Estado do Paraná (IAPAR). 1994. Cartas climáticas do estado do Paraná. IAPAR. 49p.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). 2012. Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira. 272p.

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. < https://www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em 01/02/2021.

Johnston A, Moran N, Musgrove A, Fink D, Baillie SR. Estimating species distributions from spatially biased citizen science data. Ecological Modelling, 422: 108927, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108927

Klemann-Junior L, Vallejos MAV, Scherer-Neto P, Vitule JR. Traditional scientific data vs. uncoordinated citizen science effort: a review of the current status and comparison of data on avifauna in Southern Brazil. PloS One, 12(12): e0188819, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188819

Koeppen W. 1948. Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. 1 ed. Fondo de Cultura Económica. 478p.

Lees AC, Martin RW. Exposing hidden endemism in a Neotropical forest raptor using citizen science. Ibis, 157(1): 103-114, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12207

Maack R. 2017. Geografia física do Estado do Paraná. 4 ed. UEPG. 526p.

Martinelli G, Moraes MA. 2013. Livro vermelho da flora do Brasil. 1 ed. Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 1102p.

Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots, p. 3-22. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds.). Biodiversity hotspots. Distribution and protection of conservation priority areas. Springer. 546p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1

Morante-Filho JC, Benchimol M, Faria D. Landscape composition is the strongest determinant of bird occupancy patterns in tropical forest patches. Landscape Ecology, 36: 105-117, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01121-6

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772): 853-358, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Pacheco JF, et al. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition. Ornithology Research, 29: 94-105, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x

Paraná. 2018. Decreto No 11.797, de 22 de novembro de 2018. Reconhece e atualiza lista de espécies de aves pertencentes à fauna silvestre ameaçadas de extinção no estado do Paraná e dá outras providências, atendendo o Decreto No 3.148, de 2004. Diário Oficial Do Paraná. <https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=369613>. Acesso em 01/02/2021.

Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellı́n RA, Master LL, Keith DA. Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(11): 503-507, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02614-9

Projeto MapBiomas. 2022. Coleção 6 da Série Anual de Mapas de Cobertura e Uso de Solo do Brasil. < https://mapbiomas.org/estatisticas>. Acesso em 30/04/2022.

R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.r-project.org>. Acesso em: 12/01/2020.

Rezende CL, et al. From hotspot to hopespot: an opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(4): 208-214, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.002

Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142(6): 1141-1153, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021

Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G. 1986. Akaike information criterion statistics. D. Reidel. 81p.

Scherer-Neto P, Straube FC, Carrano E, Urben-Filho A. Lista das aves do Paraná. Hori Cadernos Técnicos, 2: 1-130, 2011.

Schubert SC, Manica LT, Guaraldo ADC. Revealing the potential of a huge citizen-science platform to study bird migration. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 119(4): 364-373, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2019.1609340

Silva WL, et al. Tendências observadas em indicadores de extremos climáticos de temperatura e precipitação no estado do Paraná. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, 30(2): 181-194, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-778620130622

Silveira LF, et al. Para que servem os inventários de fauna? Estudos Avançados, 24(68): 173-207, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000100015

Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9): 467-471, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017

Straube FC. 2012. Ruínas e urubus: história da ornitologia no Paraná. Período de Natterer, 1 (1820 a 1834). Hori Consultoria Ambiental. 241p.

Straube FC. 2016. Ruínas e urubus: história da ornitologia no Paraná. Período de Chrostowski, 2 (1910). Hori Consultoria Ambiental. 457 p.

Vale MM, Tourinho L, Lorini ML, Rajão H, Figueiredo MSL. Endemic birds of the Atlantic Forest: traits, conservation status, and patterns of biodiversity. Journal of Field Ornithology, 89(3): 193-206, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12256

Published

2022-07-05

Issue

Section

Fluxo contínuo